2018
DOI: 10.1080/21620555.2018.1526067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Socioeconomic Status Affect Chinese Adolescents’ Weight Status?: A Study of Possible Pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the present study are consistent with previous literature that has examined the relationship between household socioeconomic status and BMI and body fat [53][54][55]. However, diverging from the previous studies that omitted gender in their models, the results of the present study suggested that gender was a significant moderator in the adolescent obesity modeling equation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Results of the present study are consistent with previous literature that has examined the relationship between household socioeconomic status and BMI and body fat [53][54][55]. However, diverging from the previous studies that omitted gender in their models, the results of the present study suggested that gender was a significant moderator in the adolescent obesity modeling equation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This group therefore demonstrated the best health outcomes among all three classes. Such findings can be explained by China's current transitional stage in which consuming high-fat and energy-condensed food and having a more sedentary lifestyle are considered a privilege of people with higher SES ( 78 ). Thus, the oldest-old in class 2 had less healthy lifestyles but better health outcomes.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies found that people with higher education and income reported better health and experienced lower rates of chronic diseases (Feng et al ., 2012; Wu and Zhang, 2016; Xu and Xie, 2017). Other scholars suggested that higher SES indeed led to high risky behaviours, such as smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyles and a poor diet (Kim et al ., 2004; Chen et al ., 2010; Streeter, 2017; Zhang et al ., 2018), which resulted in a higher prevalence of chronic conditions (Zimmer and Kwong, 2004). Still others demonstrated non-significant effects of SES measures on health outcomes, such as the dynamics of disability (Gu and Zeng, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%