2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does ownership influence business growth? A competitive dynamics perspective

Abstract: Firms engage in competitive actions to gain market share and hence to grow their revenues. However, not all firms are equally able to use competitive actions to drive growth. We argue that the ability to translate competitive actions to revenue growth depends on the ownership of the firm. Drawing on principal-agent and principalprincipal perspectives, we argue that: (1) private owners (both foreign and local) are better able to employ aggressive actions to grow their business than state owners; (2) firms with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, liabilities of foreignness may also arise from MNE subsidiaries' dependence on their parent organization. For example, decision processes may involve actors outside the country, which slows down the speed of competitive actions that MNE subsidiaries may undertake in local competition (Wan et al, 2020;Yang & Meyer, 2019). Moreover, strategic actions by MNE subsidiaries may have to consider the global strategic objectives of the parent firm.…”
Section: Market Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, liabilities of foreignness may also arise from MNE subsidiaries' dependence on their parent organization. For example, decision processes may involve actors outside the country, which slows down the speed of competitive actions that MNE subsidiaries may undertake in local competition (Wan et al, 2020;Yang & Meyer, 2019). Moreover, strategic actions by MNE subsidiaries may have to consider the global strategic objectives of the parent firm.…”
Section: Market Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPC introduce the government (or other political actors) as influential stakeholders who can impose their own objectives on the firm—possibly mediated by a hierarchy of control and, hence, multiple agency conflicts (Cuervo‐Cazurra, Inkpen, Musacchio, & Ramaswamy, ). The objectives of political stakeholders and the added complexities of the governance structures have been shown to influence firms' choice of growth strategies (Yang & Meyer, ), their propensity to enter foreign markets (Estrin et al, ; Hu & Cui, ), and their internationalization performance (Zou & Adams, ). These studies suggest that strategic activities of firms, such as internationalization, need to be aligned with the interests of political actors who are connected to the firm through CPC.…”
Section: Cpc In International Business: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is further corroborated by family ownership's significant, negative impact on growth in all our models, indicating that family ownership plays a crucial role in constraining business growth. With more family financial wealth and SEW at stake, a higher family ownership concentration implies a stronger concern for potential SEW and financial losses, which favors risk‐reducing decisions that enhance the firm's survival at the expense of business growth (Yang and Meyer, 2018). It is also noteworthy that when comparing FM's contrasting effects on growth, family ownership seems to be uniformly detrimental to business growth, 1 emphasizing the importance of differentiating the type of family involvement in the business to understand firm growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%