2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3349930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does Inequality of Opportunities Affect the Distribution of Economic Wellbeing in Cameroon?

Abstract: The objective of this study is to measure the empirical effects of inequality of opportunities (IOP) on the distribution of economic wellbeing, which is captured by consumption per adult equivalent of households in Cameroon. To this effect, we apply both the parametric and non-parametric approaches to measure the magnitude of IOP, and Shapley's method for its decomposition. The results show that IOP has an estimated effect of 25% in 2001 and 35% in 2007. Its main sources are the agro-ecological zone with a con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Breastfeeding comes in fourth place with 11.22%. These results are in line with those of [8], [43]. In Togo, this breakdown highlights the fact that a large majority of inequalities in nutrition are due to the possession of exploitable agricultural land, the child's sex and the parents' place of residence.…”
Section: Results and Interpretation Of The Contribution Of Circumstan...supporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Breastfeeding comes in fourth place with 11.22%. These results are in line with those of [8], [43]. In Togo, this breakdown highlights the fact that a large majority of inequalities in nutrition are due to the possession of exploitable agricultural land, the child's sex and the parents' place of residence.…”
Section: Results and Interpretation Of The Contribution Of Circumstan...supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our results show that to reach an egalitarian situation in the second ECD dimension "nutrition", one should play a trade-off by reallocating a proportion of 0.166 inequalities. This being the case, 17% of the inequalities due to the eight (8) circumstances should be reallocated between the two extremes of children. This reallocation will be from children who are not underweight, stunted and wasted to their counterparts with poor nutritional status.…”
Section: Results and Interpretation Of The Contribution Of Circumstan...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation