How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Abstract

The effect of government ownership on firm performance remains a controversial issue, especially in a transitional economy like China. Government ownership is typically viewed as adversely affecting firm performance. This study of that of Mainland China's privatization experience indicates the opposite. No matter whether it is in the form of state ownership or legal person ownership, government ownership has a positive impact on partially privatized state-owned enterprises. However, this relationship is nonlinear and shows an inverted U-shape. Given the situation of highly indebted, non-performing state-owned enterprises, we argue that too much government control is indeed bad for enterprises. But too little government ownership may not be good either. It might mean a lack of the government's political support and business connections, which are valuable and necessary to vitalize performance. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002.

Credit Constraints and FDI Spillovers in China

“…However, according to Sun et al (2002), the Chinese government uses a 'state ownership scheme', which means that if the assets of a SOE are not completely sold to private investors, the SOE is still not considered fully privatized and therefore still needs to conform with communism's public ownership principles. Hence, to take this feature into consideration, we identify a domestic firm to be state-owned if the paid-in-capital contributed by the state is strictly positive following Dollar and Wei (2007).…”

An Inverse Problem Study: Credit Risk Ratings as a Determinant of Corporate Governance and Capital Structure in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

“…Moreover, Sun et al (2002) proved that the partial government ownership is positively related to state owned enterprises (SOEs) performance. One could be rightly concerned by the fact that, in China, firms have political relationships with local government.…”

Ownership Characteristics and Earnings Management in China

“…Most studies examine the relationships between state ownership and firm value. According to resource-based theory, state-owned firms have advantages in their access to resources, tax benefits and a secured operation environment, which all add to the value of state-owned firms (Ma et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2002). In contrast, according to agency theory, state-owned firms have the burden of social responsibility and political objectives, such as maintaining employment and satisfying government annual revenue goals.…”