2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on all of the calculations above, the updated velocity of the auto-agent i is expressed by Equation (14).…”
Section: Classic Social Force Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on all of the calculations above, the updated velocity of the auto-agent i is expressed by Equation (14).…”
Section: Classic Social Force Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mehdi et al (2011), the desired velocity direction of an individual is the tangential direction of the path taking into account the existence of other individuals and obstacles, and the desired velocity of an individual does not exceed a certain fixed value [45]. Ji et al (2018) inserted a direction rule into the social force model and combined the model with a multi-agent concept. They built a simulation for the alighting and boarding process of buses [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wu et al [38] modeled bus bunching and holding control with vehicle overtaking and distributed passenger boarding behavior. Ji et al [39] provided a simulation model based on the social force paradigm and incorporated five different forces that drive individual agents' boarding and alighting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%