2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(01)00054-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do young people choose college majors?

Abstract: Ce document est publié dans l'intention de rendre accessibles les résultats préliminaires de la recherche effectuée au CIRANO, afin de susciter des échanges et des suggestions. Les idées et les opinions émises sont sous l'unique responsabilité des auteurs, et ne représentent pas nécessairement les positions du CIRANO ou de ses partenaires. This paper presents preliminary research carried out at CIRANO and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
231
1
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
231
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Since college majors strongly vary in the degree to which they promise high incomes to students (van de Werfhorst and Kraaykamp, 2001;Glocker and Storck, 2014;Ochsenfeld, 2014), gender differences in work-lifestyle preferences could contribute to horizontal sex segregation. In line with this argument Montmarquette et al (2002) show that women respond significantly less to changes in college majors' earnings potential than men do. Zafar (2013: 571) finds that pecuniary aspects of the workplace explain as much as four times of the choice for males than do non-pecuniary aspects whereas for women's choices both aspects are equally important.…”
Section: Separate Spheres: Gendered Preferencessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since college majors strongly vary in the degree to which they promise high incomes to students (van de Werfhorst and Kraaykamp, 2001;Glocker and Storck, 2014;Ochsenfeld, 2014), gender differences in work-lifestyle preferences could contribute to horizontal sex segregation. In line with this argument Montmarquette et al (2002) show that women respond significantly less to changes in college majors' earnings potential than men do. Zafar (2013: 571) finds that pecuniary aspects of the workplace explain as much as four times of the choice for males than do non-pecuniary aspects whereas for women's choices both aspects are equally important.…”
Section: Separate Spheres: Gendered Preferencessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, individuals who hold a second job for financial reasons are likely to compare the available employment opportunities they have and choose the one with the highest potential in terms of earnings capacity, in accordance with the prediction of standard models of occupational choice (e.g. Freeman, 1971;Boskin, 1974;Berger, 1988;Montmarquette et al, 2002). In order to capture this decision, a new variable in the dataset has thus been created that compares the wages that the individual is likely to receive from his current occupation with the predicted earnings from the best alternative occupation.…”
Section: Multiple Job-holding and Occupational Choicementioning
confidence: 82%
“…This reveals that expected earnings (e.g. Arcidiacono et al, 2010, Berger, 1988, Montmarquette et al, 2002 are not the only relevant factor for students' decision on the field of study. On the one hand, comparative advantages (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%