2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.12.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do we interpret an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level in asymptomatic subjects?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggested that 1.8% of carcinomas were diagnosed in the follow-up cohort, which is similar to the results of a previous study [ 8 ]. All were male.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data suggested that 1.8% of carcinomas were diagnosed in the follow-up cohort, which is similar to the results of a previous study [ 8 ]. All were male.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A previous study revealed that 1.3% of 62,976 individuals had elevated CA19-9 concentrations in Korea [ 8 ]. However, the appropriate medical advice for those asymptomatic individuals remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This situation indicates an urgent need for improved diagnosis aiming to detect pancreatic cancer at an early resectable stage which is the best hope for cure. Serum-based diagnosis is highly desirable; the best available marker in current use, CA19-9 has a sensitivity of approximately 80% and is not adequate for screening purposes particularly for the diagnosis of localized, resectable pancreatic cancers (Steinberg, 1990;Kim et al, 2009;Duffy et al, 2010;Ni et al, 2005). Enormous effort has been put into biomarker discovery in plasma or serum of cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to find tumor biomarkers for early diagnosis or tumor stage prediction. Currently the best marker available is carbohydrate antigen 19-9, which has a sensitivity of approximately 80% and thus is not adequate for screening purposes, particularly for the diagnosis of localized, resectable pancreatic cancers [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%