2015
DOI: 10.1111/bld.12149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do people with learning disabilities experience and make sense of the ageing process?

Abstract: Accessible summary We wanted to find out what getting older feels like for people with learning disabilities. We asked seven people with learning disabilities about getting older. Most of the people had noticed changes as they got older. Some felt sad or angry about it. Some worried about getting older. People said that it was important to have good friends and to do useful jobs. Some people did not know much about getting older. Some people wanted to look back over their lives to feel more settled. They mig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three further papers looked at the experience of diagnosis and disability (Dysch et al, ; Kenyon et al, ; Monteleone & Forrester Jones, ) and two at relationships (Rushbrooke et al, ; Sullivan et al, ). Other papers explored the experience of bereavement (McRitchie et al, ); ageing (Newberry et al, ); retirement from day centres (Judge et al, ); trauma (Mitchell et al, ); fire setting (Rose, Lees‐Warley, & Thrift, ); mental health (Robinson et al, ); ethnic minorities (Malik et al, ); self‐concept (Pestana, ); and identity (Dinwoodie et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Three further papers looked at the experience of diagnosis and disability (Dysch et al, ; Kenyon et al, ; Monteleone & Forrester Jones, ) and two at relationships (Rushbrooke et al, ; Sullivan et al, ). Other papers explored the experience of bereavement (McRitchie et al, ); ageing (Newberry et al, ); retirement from day centres (Judge et al, ); trauma (Mitchell et al, ); fire setting (Rose, Lees‐Warley, & Thrift, ); mental health (Robinson et al, ); ethnic minorities (Malik et al, ); self‐concept (Pestana, ); and identity (Dinwoodie et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen papers were rated as “acceptable” (Anslow, ; Brown & Beail, ; Dysch, Chung, & Fox, ; Gould & Dodd, ; Kenyon, Beail, & Jackson, ; MacMahon et al, ; Malik, Unwin, Larkin, Kroese, & Rose, ; McRitchie, McKenzie, Quayle, Harlin, & Neumann, ; Mitchell, Clegg, & Furniss, ; Monteleone & Forrester‐Jones, ; Newberry, Martin, & Robbins, ; Robinson, Escopri, Stenfert Kroese, & Rose, ; Rushbrooke, Murray, & Townsend, ; Shewan, McKenzie, Quayle, & Crawley, ; Sullivan et al, ; Wilson et al, ). All of these papers subscribed to the theoretical principles of IPA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in the process of ageing, maintaining good relationships with surrounding friends and family members plays a vital part in an enjoyable life, and a strong emphasis on roles and autonomy is important factors contributing to pride and happiness (Newberry et al . ), and a high level of family involvement may have a positive impact on an ill family member (Park & Chesla ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respect for parents has supreme value in the Confucian tradition; if the child is filial, the performance of the parents will be considered good, and parents' self-worth is judged by how well they perform as parents (Park & Chesla 2007), which is why the participants expressed the view that they were very fortunate to be taken care of by their children. Therefore, in the process of ageing, maintaining good relationships with surrounding friends and family members plays a vital part in an enjoyable life, and a strong emphasis on roles and autonomy is important factors contributing to pride and happiness (Newberry et al 2015), and a high level of family involvement may have a positive impact on an ill family member (Park & Chesla 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%