Is it possible to use interpretative phenomenological analysis in research with people who have intellectual disabilities?

Abstract

Background This paper examines the appropriateness of using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in research with people who have intellectual disabilities, focussing on quality. Methods We conducted a systematic search to identify published studies. We assessed the quality of the studies using a bespoke framework, adapted from previous reviews, and articles on indicators of “good” IPA work. Results Twenty‐eight papers were reviewed. The studies were of varying quality: 6 (22%) papers were rated as “good” quality; 16 (57%) were “acceptable”, and 6 (21%) were “poor.” This ratio was comparable to that found in assessments of IPA papers in other domains, suggesting that issues of quality reflect researcher competence, rather than challenges with the population. Conclusions IPA can be an appropriate methodology to use with people with intellectual disabilities. We encourage researchers to develop more detailed analyses, to provide more transparency about their sampling strategies, and more detail of the characteristics of their samples.

The value of competitive employment: In‐depth accounts of people with intellectual disabilities

“…In line with previous studies (e.g. Giesbers et al, 2018; Rose et al., 2019), this study demonstrates the value of IPA in research on intellectual disabilities by providing rich data on their lived experiences. In this study, we subjected our findings to member checks with participants—an element that is increasingly being used for purposes of validation in IPA and other qualitative research methods (e.g.…”

Making recovery meaningful for people with intellectual disabilities

“…The nature of recovery naturally lends itself to qualitative methodology, in particular IPA, as the underlying concept of recovery is described as an individual developing a meaningful understanding of a "deeply human experience" (Anthony, 1993). Furthermore, IPA has been successfully employed in people with intellectual disabilities (Rose et al, 2019).…”

Self-Advocates with Intellectual Disability about Their Work as Social Educators – a Qualitative Polish Study

“…In order to answer the research question, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Design and analysis of the interviews were based on the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis framework (IPA) (Smith et al, 1999;, taking into account recent guidelines by Rose et al (2019) about using IPA in research with people with ID.…”

“…Following the suggestion by Rose et al (2019), for the sake of anonymity and easiness of tracking information, the participants in this report were assigned pseudonyms not connected in any way to their real names. Table 1 presents the pseudonyms and additional data about the participants (gender, additional diagnoses, employment status, relationship status).…”