2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do people make sense of wealth and poverty?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since people typically view others’ gains as coming at their own expense (but not vice-versa; Roberts & Davidai, in press), such broad identification with “the poor” may foster a belief that the rich gain at both one’s own and everyone else’s expense. On the other hand, people often view “the poor” unfavorably (Fiske et al, 2002), attribute their outcomes to internal failings (Davidai, 2021), and draw clear distinctions between themselves and worse-off others (Kuziemko et al, 2014). Thus, even when engaging in upward comparisons, people may be reluctant to identify with worse-off others, and therefore interpret zero-sum relationships as relating to how “the rich” gain at the expense of “the poor” rather than how “the rich” gain at their own, personal expense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since people typically view others’ gains as coming at their own expense (but not vice-versa; Roberts & Davidai, in press), such broad identification with “the poor” may foster a belief that the rich gain at both one’s own and everyone else’s expense. On the other hand, people often view “the poor” unfavorably (Fiske et al, 2002), attribute their outcomes to internal failings (Davidai, 2021), and draw clear distinctions between themselves and worse-off others (Kuziemko et al, 2014). Thus, even when engaging in upward comparisons, people may be reluctant to identify with worse-off others, and therefore interpret zero-sum relationships as relating to how “the rich” gain at the expense of “the poor” rather than how “the rich” gain at their own, personal expense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older teenagers (14–17 years) demonstrate more awareness of structural factors and how inequality is related to economic and political systems (e.g., ‘not many people have the skill to do that job, so the pay is high’; ‘capitalism means a small number of people have most of the wealth’; Diaz et al, 2022; Dickinson, 1990; Flanagan et al, 2014; Leahy, 1983), but sophisticated structural explanations remain comparatively rare. Indeed, individualistic explanations for wealth and poverty persist in adulthood (Davidai, 2022) and are the most common explanation that adults give for pay differentials (Dickinson, 2006) in Western, capitalist societies like the United Kingdom and the United States.…”
Section: Children's Understanding Of Inequality: From Having and Not ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The language of motivation must be used with caution by social workers. While inner drive enhances task completion, focusing primarily on inner drive and ignoring structural factors can lead to narratives of pathology for the marginalized populations served by social workers (Davidai, 2022;Taylor et al, 2011). In fact, SDT began as a counter to the view of motivation as solely internal or external, by considering both person and social environment as supporting or undermining the three psychological needs whose fulfillment is essential to motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1980).…”
Section: Motivation and Social Work Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%