How do People Construct Communication about their Creative Process? Study on Future Creative Professionals

Abstract

Process of communication can be challenging. At first participants must standardize their concepts of things to hold them close enough to others' concepts, then it's crucial to use appropriate expressions to verbalize those concepts to ensure the mutual understanding. Therefore, it can be problematic when cognitive constructs are hard to standardize, as in the case of creative process. That's because communicating about socially constituted objects is much easier than talking about those that are distinctive. Data in this study was gathered by qualitative survey with self-completed questionnaire of open-ended questions. It was conducted between students of creativity-related studies right after their creative work on a project. The aim of the study was to evaluate and observe proficiency in talking about one's ideas and communicate about creative process that led to them. The study has shown that creative process is identified only with its final phase-ideation. This "big idea" is seen as the result of having talent, not as the result of analytical thinking. Over half of the respondents believe that their idea was created by accident.. Respondents don't see creative process as a common phenomenon, they only refer to it as an inner experience of a certain individual.

High Education Radical Transformation Era: How Teachers’ Competency can enhance the Students’ Employability?

“…Continuously, Shulman (1986) and Shulman (1987) systematically list four teacher individual ability competences and these are (1) the teaching situation analytical competency for editing useful teaching materials, (2) the specifi c lecturing approach competency for leading students to break through their myths, (3) the technological utilization competence for adopting digital education technology and (4) the social relationship competence for connecting cordial relations between teachers and students. Specifi cally, Glatthorn et al (2006) distinctively categorized four analytical aspects and these are (1) Individual Demand Competency ("IDC"): IDC covers two individual characters of Self-transcendence ("St") and Emotioncontrol ("Ec") in the teaching processes (Lambert et al, 1996), Professional Knowledge Competency ("PKC"): PKC includes three coaching abilities of Subject Knowledge Lecturing ("SKL"), Problem-solving Techniques ("PsT") and Classroom Management Skills ("CMS") (Liberman, 1956) in the teaching methods, Resource Satisfaction Competency ("RSC"): RSC comprehends two supporting resource of Teaching Resource Distribution ("TRD") and School's Administrative Satisfaction ("SAS") in teaching actions for educational institutes (Lo, 2016) as well as Cooperative Relationship Competency ("CRC"): CRC comprises of two relationship development of Social Developing Techniques ("SDT") and Interfl ow Communication Abilities ("ICA") in education behaviours (Lunn, & Bishop, 2002;Gliniecka, 2016). Moreover, there are 9 assessed criteria to be integrated as illustrated in Figure 1.…”

Exploring the Most Decisive Online Education Determinants as Impacted by Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy

“…Eventually, there are four analytical dimensions of each HE faculty. These are resource satisfaction competency (RSC) (Kirkham, 2004;Rieckmann, 2012); professional knowledge competency (PKC) (Kirby et al, 2011); individual demand competency (IDC) (Shulman, 1987;Shephard et al, 2011) and cooperative relationship competency (CRC) (Lunn & Bishop, 2002;Yorio & Ye, 2012;Gliniecka, 2016).…”

Inquiring the Most Critical Teacher’s Technology Education Competences in the Highest Efficient Technology Education Learning Organization

“…comprehends two supporting resource in teaching actions and these are teaching resource distribution and school's administrative satisfaction in educational institutions (Lo, 2016) and (4) CRC comprises two relationship development in education behaviors and these are social developing techniques and interflow communication abilities (Lunn & Bishop,2002;Gliniecka, 2016).…”