2020
DOI: 10.33788/rcis.68.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Education Radical Transformation Era: How Teachers’ Competency can enhance the Students’ Employability?

Abstract: In order to assess the correlation between teachers' competency and a higher education students' employability, this research systematically cross-employs the Analytical Network Process (ANP) approach of quantitative analysis and the Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method of qualitative analysis to measure a series of questionnaire results from two groups of experts. As a result, the most valuable and contributive conclusion is that the three core teachers' competency (Cooperative Relationsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These briefly identified categories include (1) social approval (SA): the entire society directly responds, cognizes, and further supports and influences each individual attitude, behavior, and action as well as the organizational development [ 37 ]; (2) social reinforcement (SR): the majority of persons and organizations aggressively desire to be identified through a series of studying and learning the professional social skills to deal with a bulk of behavioral norms and organizational differences with reference to public acceptance and approval; (3) social exchange (SE): each individual follows the operational conditioning principles which means the interactions among the individuals, organization, and entire society are decided by the behavioral results through the social identity [ 38 ]. The interactions will continue if the individual behavioral results and organizational development are positive; the interactions will stop if the behavioral results and organizational development are negative [ 39 ]; (4) social categorization (SCA): the individuals are classified by their personality and characteristics into their belonging groups (organizations) and then, the individuals are further defined by their social categorization [ 40 ]; and (5) social comparison (SCP): the individuals compare their belonging group (organizations) with other groups (organizations) in terms of the group’s prestige and social standing to obtain higher self-esteem; significantly, in-belonging groups (organizations) will not compare themselves with just any out-groups because the SC must be relative to each situation and condition.…”
Section: Methodological Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These briefly identified categories include (1) social approval (SA): the entire society directly responds, cognizes, and further supports and influences each individual attitude, behavior, and action as well as the organizational development [ 37 ]; (2) social reinforcement (SR): the majority of persons and organizations aggressively desire to be identified through a series of studying and learning the professional social skills to deal with a bulk of behavioral norms and organizational differences with reference to public acceptance and approval; (3) social exchange (SE): each individual follows the operational conditioning principles which means the interactions among the individuals, organization, and entire society are decided by the behavioral results through the social identity [ 38 ]. The interactions will continue if the individual behavioral results and organizational development are positive; the interactions will stop if the behavioral results and organizational development are negative [ 39 ]; (4) social categorization (SCA): the individuals are classified by their personality and characteristics into their belonging groups (organizations) and then, the individuals are further defined by their social categorization [ 40 ]; and (5) social comparison (SCP): the individuals compare their belonging group (organizations) with other groups (organizations) in terms of the group’s prestige and social standing to obtain higher self-esteem; significantly, in-belonging groups (organizations) will not compare themselves with just any out-groups because the SC must be relative to each situation and condition.…”
Section: Methodological Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A careful study of the numerous opinions of our predecessors, including those mentioned so far, and many others (Broucker et al, 2018;Mampaey et al, 2017;Bilyalova et al, 2019;Hsieh and Usak, 2020;Maksymenko, 2021) formed a conscious vision of the reasons that caused the surge of attention to the outlined topic. It refers to the transformations prompted by the massive adoption of digital technology that generate, process, share and transfer information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the last six years, the unemployment rate for college or university diploma graduates was approximately 5%. A study by Hsieh and Usak (2020) recommended a systematic development of three effective teachers' abilities, which are Cooperative Relationship Competency (CRS), Interflow Communication Abilities (ICA), and Teaching Resource Distribution (TRD) of Resource Satisfaction Competency (RSC) to improve graduate employability, employment rate and the value higher education in Taiwan. Likewise, Baek, Cho and Kim (2019) analysed the impact of convergence education as well as academic performance on employability using employability-course matched data on graduates from a college of engineering in Korea from 2008 to 2015.…”
Section: Knowledge Experience and Skills Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%