How Do Men Construct and Explain Men’s Violence?

Abstract

In this study, we examine men's constructions of violence and their explanations of their own violent behavior. Interviews were conducted with 12 adult men, employed in industrial and manual labor, regarding their associations with violence, their reasons for engaging in violent behavior, and their reasons for not engaging in violent behavior. Utilizing consensual qualitative research methodology, our findings indicated that men's constructions of violence and their justifications for engaging in violence were linked to their constructions of masculinity and what it meant to them to be a man. Results are discussed through the lenses of multiple gender-based theories and ultimately, deemed to demonstrate the most support for the notion of precarious manhood. Specifically, violence was viewed as necessary in particular situations to assert or maintain one's social status and sense of self as masculine when faced with threats to manhood status. Implications for psychological intervention and practice with men are discussed, including identifying positive alternatives to violence that preserve one's sense of self as masculine.

The Utility of a Psycho-Social Approach for Understanding and Addressing Male Youth Violence: The Interface between Traumatic Experiences and Masculinity

“…Internationally, little is understood about young men's experiences of crime and violence, particularly as a perpetrator. Research exploring the causes of men's violence and challenges as a result of exposure to violent crime largely focus on men's perpetration of violence against women (Dagirmanjian et al, 2016). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis that have been undertaken to date have tended to focus on intervention effectiveness rather than explanatory variables.…”

Assistência de enfermagem a queimados em hospital do nordeste brasileiro: estudo seccional

“…Os principais achados do presente estudo demonstram uma predominância de vítimas do sexo masculino. A masculinidade, historicamente, está associada ao comportamento agressivo ou imprudente [8] e é percebida como inerente à natureza masculina e necessária para manutenção da imagem de poder [9]. Logo, esse comportamento pode explicar o maior risco de acidentes, sobretudo com queimaduras.…”

It Takes Two to Tango: Public Attitudes Toward Prevention of Workplace Violence Against Health Care Staff: A Mixed-Methods Study

“…A possible explanation may be related to a different perception of violence by gender. Dagirmanjian et al (2017) found that men explain and justify violent behavior through social contexts of the male role in society. In certain situations, violent behavior was perceived as essential when there is a sense of threat to one’s social status or self-image.…”