Abstract:Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) parents raise well-adjusted children. How do they accomplish this feat despite stigma and discrimination? Psychological scholarship (often based in the United States and other Westernized countries) has typically used atheoretical, deficit models based on biased assumptions to compare the outcomes of children of LGBTQ+ parents and children of cisgender heterosexual parents. However, research on processes and socialization within LGBTQ+-parent families sug… Show more
“…The decision to keep this portion of the model the same as Meyer's (2003) original minority stress model was influenced by findings from studies we reviewed that show that stressors still have a direct effect on the mental health outcomes for queer individuals and families (e.g., Bockting et al, 2013; Fulginiti et al, 2020; Green et al, 2022) and that coping and social support impact the strength of this effect (e.g., Mereish et al, 2022; Meyer, 2015; Wong et al, 2014). We urge the use of the TIMS model to support the efforts of scholars who have shifted the focus of LGBTQ+ research from a deficit approach to a strengths‐based one by highlighting queer joy (Travers et al, 2022), resistance (e.g., Robinson & Schmitz, 2021), and thriving (Farr et al, 2022). This paradigm shift helps to highlight the positive experiences that LGBTQ+ families encounter in their day‐to‐day lives.…”
Section: Comparing and Contrasting Mst And Tims Modelsmentioning
Two decades have passed since Ilan Meyer first published the minority stress theory (MST) model. Since then, scholars have used MST extensively to expand the field's understanding of LGBTQ+ populations' experiences with stress and mental health. To better represent these experiences, scholars have combined MST with other theories in empirical articles, but a theoretical model has yet to be proposed that unifies this work. In the current paper, we seek to acknowledge and extend this work by proposing a Temporal Intersectional Minority Stress (TIMS) model. The TIMS model incorporates Intersectionality and historical, generational, and developmental time from Life Course Theory to account for the sociopolitical and cultural changes that have occurred since the creation of the original MST model. We hope this model will help extend work related to minority stress, and we invite further theoretical development to occur using this model as a new framework for scholars to consider.
“…The decision to keep this portion of the model the same as Meyer's (2003) original minority stress model was influenced by findings from studies we reviewed that show that stressors still have a direct effect on the mental health outcomes for queer individuals and families (e.g., Bockting et al, 2013; Fulginiti et al, 2020; Green et al, 2022) and that coping and social support impact the strength of this effect (e.g., Mereish et al, 2022; Meyer, 2015; Wong et al, 2014). We urge the use of the TIMS model to support the efforts of scholars who have shifted the focus of LGBTQ+ research from a deficit approach to a strengths‐based one by highlighting queer joy (Travers et al, 2022), resistance (e.g., Robinson & Schmitz, 2021), and thriving (Farr et al, 2022). This paradigm shift helps to highlight the positive experiences that LGBTQ+ families encounter in their day‐to‐day lives.…”
Section: Comparing and Contrasting Mst And Tims Modelsmentioning
Two decades have passed since Ilan Meyer first published the minority stress theory (MST) model. Since then, scholars have used MST extensively to expand the field's understanding of LGBTQ+ populations' experiences with stress and mental health. To better represent these experiences, scholars have combined MST with other theories in empirical articles, but a theoretical model has yet to be proposed that unifies this work. In the current paper, we seek to acknowledge and extend this work by proposing a Temporal Intersectional Minority Stress (TIMS) model. The TIMS model incorporates Intersectionality and historical, generational, and developmental time from Life Course Theory to account for the sociopolitical and cultural changes that have occurred since the creation of the original MST model. We hope this model will help extend work related to minority stress, and we invite further theoretical development to occur using this model as a new framework for scholars to consider.
“…Overall, research has shown that lesbian and gay parents experienced heightened levels of stress and anxiety during the pandemic, also related to concerns about their children’s well-being and the potential for discrimination or prejudice (Goldberg et al, 2021; Salerno et al, 2020). Further examination of parental burnout in parents with minoritized sexual identities is needed, given that they face partially different stressors (e.g., they tend to experience more stigmatization and less social support; Leal et al, 2021) but also benefit from partially different resources (e.g., they typically demonstrate a more egalitarian division of unpaid household and childcare labor; Carone & Lingiardi, 2022; Farr et al, 2022), relative to heterosexual parents. Therefore, the present study examined some factors associated with parental burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic in lesbian and gay parents with school-age children born through assisted reproduction.…”
Section: Coparenting and Parental Burnout Prior To And During The Cov...mentioning
The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a model of stressful situations for parents insofar as it led to unprecedented difficulties in childcare and caregiving, resulting in increased levels of parental burnout, worldwide. To date, research on parental burnout has mainly involved heterosexual parents. However, parents with minoritized sexual identities face partially different stressors, including internalized sexual stigma, and they also have partially different resources, including a more egalitarian division of childcare labor. Between April 2020 and February 2021, 32 lesbian mother families by donor insemination (n = 64 lesbian mothers) and 28 gay father families by gestational surrogacy (n = 56 gay fathers), all with a child aged 6-10 years and living in Italy, were recruited. In each family, both parents self-rated their parental burnout, coparenting, and internalized sexual stigma. Multilevel modeling indicated that lesbian mothers reported greater parental burnout than gay fathers. Moreover, lower coparenting quality was associated with greater parental burnout. Finally, internalized sexual stigma had a significant both direct and interactive effect on parental burnout, with higher levels of internalized sexual stigma resulting in greater parental burnout, especially in gay fathers. Considering the sexual minority stress theory and the risks and resources balance theory, the results indicate the importance of preventing and treating parental burnout in lesbian and gay parents by focusing on their internalized sexual stigma and coparenting relationship. Also, incorporating the positive psychology framework in future research would help identify in these parents the resources deriving from their minoritized sexual identities to deal with parental burnout.
“…Instead, we should be “setting our own agendas” in our research, and resisting the urge to engage with offensive and anti‐LGBTQ+ research and theorizing (Clarke, 2000, p. 157). Setting our own agendas may lead us to explore long‐understudied and difficult topics within LGBTQ+ parent families—as well as, or perhaps in concert with, choosing to focus on the many strengths and resilience of LGBTQ+ parent families (e.g., Farr et al, 2022; Gartrell et al, 2019).…”
In this article, I employ a feminist perspective in examining the interconnections across my personal, professional, and political activities. Rather than smoothing out the inconsistencies, tensions, and difficult spots, I strive to engage with them as points of entry to deeper knowledge and understanding. I begin by discussing elements of my personal upbringing, and the ways that it shaped my lens on families and my interest in the hidden and less understood aspects of family life. I then examine my professional career and trajectory, and how it has shifted alongside changes in the sociopolitical landscape, the evolution of scholarship in LGBTQ+ families, and my own privilege. I also explore how I have grappled with but also leveraged the politicized and political nature of my research, and sought to be an agent of change beyond the four walls of the university. I end with my thoughts on the benefits of this type of reflexive exercise for new and seasoned scholars.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.