2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1431008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Do Legal Rules Evolve? Evidence from a Cross-Country Comparison of Shareholder, Creditor and Worker Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Armour et al (2009), Lele and Siems (2007), and Siems (2008) assert that the method used to estimate the status of legal institutions in the law and finance literature has national biases. For example, eight variables used to develop an index of shareholder protection in La Porta et al (1998) is criticized to have a US bias (Armour et al 2009;Lele and Siems 2007). National biases can be avoided by considering variables developed by global multilateral, standard-setting bodies as a benchmark.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Fcp Regime In Malaysia: Methodological Framentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Armour et al (2009), Lele and Siems (2007), and Siems (2008) assert that the method used to estimate the status of legal institutions in the law and finance literature has national biases. For example, eight variables used to develop an index of shareholder protection in La Porta et al (1998) is criticized to have a US bias (Armour et al 2009;Lele and Siems 2007). National biases can be avoided by considering variables developed by global multilateral, standard-setting bodies as a benchmark.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Fcp Regime In Malaysia: Methodological Framentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armour et al (2009), Lele and Siems (2007), and Siems (2008) assert that measurements of legal institutions should be comprehensive to capture their complete strength and status. For example, Buchanan et al (2014;p.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Fcp Regime In Malaysia: Methodological Framentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Figure 2 represents how shareholder protection law has developed in France, Germany, India, the UK and the US from 1970 to 2005. Equivalent pictures have been created for creditor and worker protection (see ARMOUR et al [2009a], DE-AKIN et al [2007]). Table 3 summarises the results of all five-country aggregates.…”
Section: How Well Are Shareholders Creditors and Workers Protected?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second step, equivalent mathematical operations have been used for the five-country creditor and worker protection indices. The result is that that the 25,920 observations of the initial three indices (see section 4.1, above) are transformed into 36 × 10 × 3 = 1,080 observations which indicate the differences between these five countries (SIEMS [2009a]). In particular, this data can be used in order to determine whether these legal systems have converged or diverged.…”
Section: How Much Do Legal Systems Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation