How do health services engage culturally and linguistically diverse consumers? An analysis of consumer engagement frameworks in Australia

Abstract

Background Engagement frameworks provide the conceptual structure for consumer engagement in healthcare decision making, but the level to which these frameworks support culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) consumer engagement is not known. Objective This study aimed to investigate how consumer engagement is conceptualised and operationalized and to determine the implications of current consumer engagement frameworks for engagement with CALD consumers. Method Altheide's document analysis approach was used to guide a systematic search, selection and analytic process. Australian Government health department websites were searched for eligible publicly available engagement frameworks. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results Eleven engagement frameworks published between 2007 and 2019 were identified and analysed. Only four frameworks discussed engagement with CALD consumers distinctly. Organisational prerequisites to enhance engagement opportunities and approaches to enable activities of engagement were highlighted to improve CALD consumers' active participation in decision making; however, these largely focused on language, with limited exploration of culturally sensitive services. Conclusion There is limited discussion of what culturally sensitive services look like and what resources are needed to enhance CALD consumer engagement in high‐level decision making. Health services and policy makers can enhance opportunities for engagement with CALD consumers by being flexible in their approach, implementing policies for reimbursement for participation and evaluating and adapting the activities of engagement in collaboration with CALD consumers. Patient/Public Contribution This study is part of a wider ‘CanEngage’ project, which includes a consumer investigator, and is supported by a consumer advisory group. The study was conceived with inputs from the consumer advisory group, which continued to meet regularly with the project team to discuss the methodology and emerging findings.

Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: A coproduced eDelphi study

“…16,17,19 Thus, this study provides direction for the planning and provision of learning and development in QI partnership capabilities which have been identified as important to enhance meaningful CCI. 8,9,15,24,31 To the research team's knowledge, this is the first capability framework published in the healthcare literature that focuses on both consumers and staff. 32 positive attitudes, and behaviours.…”

Does customised care improve satisfaction and positively enable parents in sustained home visiting for mothers and children experiencing adversity?

“…A qualitative study (50) found that home visiting nurses reported di culties in communication and in the building of relationships with culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) mothers. Language barriers hindered the effective engagement of mothers with CALD backgrounds (51). Improved knowledge of the unique needs and preferences of culturally diverse mothers, and the development of skills to work in ways that are curious, respectful and sensitive to difference, are vital to improving maternal satisfaction, and ultimately health outcomes for parents and children (52).…”

Optimising co-design with ethnic minority consumers

“…Seldom heard groups can include people from ethnic minorities, refugees and asylum seekers, older people who are frail, people with intellectual disability, people with mental health issues, rural and regional communities, and gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex people [ 9 ]. Existing organisational structures and practices for involvement may not provide opportunity for equal involvement with seldom heard groups as the current processes and structure may not be conducive to their needs for equal participation [ 11 , 12 ]. An inability to consider the consequences arising from the lack or diverse representation in co-design may risk exacerbating existing biases experienced by seldom heard groups and or limit the uptake of co-designed change [ 13 , 14 ].…”

“…A six-step framework proposed by Dietrich et al, based on their insights generated from six co-design groups with adolescents, comprised of resourcing, planning, recruiting, sensitising, facilitation and evaluation as six steps for enhancing involvement of adolescents in co-design process [ 22 ]. Despite recognition of the need to ensure ethnic diversity involvement within engagement practices more generally in healthcare, supporting by a recent document analysis of engagement frameworks in Australia, the mechanisms of how to achieve strong engagement in healthcare generally and resources to support the operationalisation of inclusive co-design with ethnic minority populations specifically remain limited [ 12 ].…”

“…Opportunities to contribute to the project were made clear with participation sought in identifying the safety issues for focus, co-leading the workshops, planning the workshops, assisting with CALD consumer engagement in workshops, and liaising with participants in between workshops to collect their feedback. Consumer co- facilitators took a leadership role, making decisions on how the sessions will be run, moderated and their content [ 12 ]. The scope of this role was collaboratively refined in developing the Terms of Reference.…”