How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations

Abstract

This paper contests the conventional wisdom that travel is a derived demand, at least as an absolute. Rather, we suggest that under some circumstances, travel is desired for its own sake. We discuss the phenomenon of undirected travel ± cases in which travel is not a byproduct of the activity but itself constitutes the activity. The same reasons why people enjoy undirected travel (a sense of speed, motion, control, enjoyment of beauty) may motivate them to undertake excess travel even in the context of mandatory or maintenance trips. One characteristic of undirected travel is that the destination is ancillary to the travel rather than the converse which is usually assumed. We argue that the destination may be to some degree ancillary more often than is realized. Measuring a positive anity for travel is complex: in selfreports of attitudes toward travel, respondents are likely to confound their utility for the activities conducted at the destination, and for activities conducted while traveling, with their utility for traveling itself. Despite this measurement challenge, preliminary empirical results from a study of more than 1900 residents of the San Francisco Bay Area provide suggestive evidence for a positive utility for travel, and for a desired travel time budget (TTB). The issues raised here have clear policy implications: the way people will react to policies intended to reduce vehicle travel will depend in part on the relative weights they assign to the three components of a utility for travel. Improving our forecasts of travel behavior may require viewing travel literally as a``good'' as well as a``bad'' (disutility). Ó

The determinants of shopping duration on workdays in The Netherlands

“…If shopping is more interesting, or even exhilarating in a more urbanized environment, people may be less inclined to stop participating once they have decided to go shopping. This idea is consistent with the notion that shopping activities fulfill more purposes than the mere purchase of goods, such as a need for social interaction, or variety seeking (Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001;Tonn, 1984). Furthermore, high-order consumer goods are usually only available in larger shopping centers in more urbanized environments, so the type of goods purchased varies with the type of environment.…”

Developments and key issues in tourism mobilities

“…In terms of tourism mobilities we argue that the action of travel may be not only to serve a particular purpose but can also act as an integral feature of many tourists' experiential demands (see Bauman, 1998;Butler and Hannam, 2012, 2013a, 2013bMohktarian and Salomon 2001). What transports a tourist can therefore considerably shape or alter the overall tourist experience (Edensor, 2007;Huijbens and Benediktsson, 2007;Larsen, 2001).…”

Towards a microeconomic framework for modelling the joint choice of activity–travel behaviour and ICT use

“…tele-conferencing while travelling on a train or doing shopping while waiting for a bus. While the phenomenon of multitasking is firmly grounded in the existing time use studies (Hedges, 1974;Harvey, 1993;Frazis and Stewart, 2007;Kenyon, 2008), in the context of in-travel time use it has only quite recently received renewed attention (the first treatment of the issue dates back to the study of business travellers by Hensher in 1977) due to its likely impact on the travel experience and possibly valuation of travel time savings Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001;Redmond and Mokhtarian, 2001;Ettema and Verschuren, 2007). Such substantial research effort backed by empirical evidence and likely profound implications for transport investment appraisal (Pawlak et al, 2011) motivated inclusion of the in-travel time use possibility in the course of developing our framework.…”