2019
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2018.07.0142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Critical Is the Assimilation Frequency of Water Content Measurements for Obtaining Soil Hydraulic Parameters with Data Assimilation?

Abstract: Core Ideas Ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation was used to predict soil water content. Analyzed data assimilation frequencies were 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 14 d. Assimilation of observed data every 7 d or more yielded better results. Data assimilation (DA) is a promising alternative to infer soil hydraulic parameters from soil water dynamics data. Frequency of measurements and updates are important controls of DA efficiency; however, no strict guidance exists on determining the optimal frequency. In th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different DA intervals have also been applied into other geophysical applications. Valdes‐Abellan et al (2019) studied the impact of assimilation frequency of water content measurements for obtaining soil hydraulic parameters. Using an EnKF with a state augmentation approach to update both model states and parameters, results showed that high frequency update does not provide better soil hydraulic parameters than low frequency update.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different DA intervals have also been applied into other geophysical applications. Valdes‐Abellan et al (2019) studied the impact of assimilation frequency of water content measurements for obtaining soil hydraulic parameters. Using an EnKF with a state augmentation approach to update both model states and parameters, results showed that high frequency update does not provide better soil hydraulic parameters than low frequency update.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the frequency of EnKF-based water content DA is investigated for soil hydraulic models. 18 The results show that DA with high update frequencies does not provide better results than those obtained using low frequencies. An EnKF-based DA procedure for water quality forecasting is developed by Kim et al 19 The authors suggested that the time interval (they called it window size ) should be chosen carefully: if the window size is too small, the procedure works largely as a filter rather than a smoother, which reduces performance; if the window size is too large, some of the observations being assimilated may be too old and/or redundant to be informative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At each of the six locations, the soil moisture is taken at three depths, z 1 = 0.33 m, z 2 = 0.75 m, and z 3 = 0.95 m, below the surface, summing up to a total of 12 measurement locations and 6 validation locations. Even though hourly observations are available, the updates are performed only daily to increase the computational efficiency and because it has been shown that higher assimilation frequencies have a negative impact on the soil moisture estimates (Valdes-Abellan et al, 2019). The soil moisture values from the reference runs are perturbed with random white noise with a standard deviation of ε = 0.01 to account for the measurement error.…”
Section: Enkfmentioning
confidence: 99%