2023
DOI: 10.5194/hess-27-1301-2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of parameter updates on soil moisture assimilation in a 3D heterogeneous hillslope model

Abstract: Abstract. Variably saturated subsurface flow models require knowledge of the soil hydraulic parameters. However, the determination of these parameters in heterogeneous soils is not easily feasible and subject to large uncertainties. As the modeled soil moisture is very sensitive to these parameters, especially the saturated hydraulic conductivity, porosity, and the parameters describing the retention and relative permeability functions, it is likewise highly uncertain. Data assimilation can be used to handle a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the EnKF is also used to update the most sensitive parameter (saturated hydraulic conductivities) in ParFlow. The other parameters were not updated because Brandhorst & Neuweiler, 2023 found that updating multiple parameters for the unsaturated zone is prone to causing numerical instabilities, even in synthetic studies.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the EnKF is also used to update the most sensitive parameter (saturated hydraulic conductivities) in ParFlow. The other parameters were not updated because Brandhorst & Neuweiler, 2023 found that updating multiple parameters for the unsaturated zone is prone to causing numerical instabilities, even in synthetic studies.…”
Section: Data Assimilation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model underwent multiple spin-up sessions using 2020 meteorological data to establish an initial condition that closely mirrors the monitoring datasets. Given the heterogeneity of the basin, effective auto-calibration was challenging, leading to a preference for manual calibration as a common practice for ISSHMs (Shi et al, 2014;Thornton et al, 2022;Brandhorst and Neuweiler, 2023). We leveraged previous uncertainty analysis and parameter sensitivity studies (Baroni et al, 2010;Song et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2020) to select the most crucial parameters for this hands-on calibration process.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%