2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How critical events shape the evolution of sales organizations: A case study of a business-to-business services firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis revealed the clients used three primary dimensions to Wallendorf and Belk (1989) and Beeler et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis revealed the clients used three primary dimensions to Wallendorf and Belk (1989) and Beeler et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conduct the research in a trustworthy fashion, we carefully incorporated measures in each step of the research efforts to ensure credibility, transferability, dependability, conformability, and integrity (Beeler, Zablah, & Johnston, 2017;Wallendorf & Belk, 1989). An overview of measures taken to ensure trustworthiness is found in Table 2 below.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies have been used to explore such topics as the evolution of sales firms (Beeler, Zablah, and Johnston 2017), the integration of marketing and sales (Järvinen and Taiminen 2016), and the implementation of a key account management program (Guenzi and Storbacka 2015). The case study approach is ideal for our study, as we (1) explore the complex CS function, (2) examine the CSM role in comparison to the more traditional frontline roles of sales and service, (3) account for the richness of CS interactions and interfaces that occur over time involving many actors and tasks, (4) investigate an organic context that limits researcher control over events, and (5) develop rather than test theory concerning CS management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each interview was compared continuously with other interviews and with the other data to develop consistent themes and findings and to consider other perspectives or new information [53]. Then, the differences between the two interpretations were discussed by the researchers [54]. The multiple data sources and the triangulation between the two researchers strongly support the validity of the research findings [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%