How cancer research could benefit from the Complex Intervention Framework: students' experiences of the European Academy of Nursing Science summer school

Senn, Beate; Kirsch, Monika; Sanz, Cristina Ceinos; Karlou, Chrysoula; Tulus, K.; Leeuw, Jacqueline de; Ringnér, Anders; Goossens, Godelieve; Cleary, Vicki

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01237.x

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, nursing research needs to focus on intervention studies to be more applicable for clinicians and patients. [29][30][31] It is important for intervention studies to include when possible PRO self-reporting measures to monitor subjective adverse events and assess specific treatment benefits from the patient perspective. 32,33 This may improve the quality and completeness of disease specific intervention outcome data, provide a more comprehensive picture of the patient experience and improve the efficiency of clinical operations.…”

Section: Future Research Implications/perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Women with Vulvar Neoplasia – Current Situation and Future Directions

Senn¹,

Eicher²,

Mueller³

et al. 2013

European Oncology &Amp; Haematology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses concerns about women with vulvar neoplasia (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and vulvar cancer) and the available surgical treatment options. Given the gaps in the evidence base in terms of women with vulvar neoplasia and surgical treatment the women with vulvar Neoplasia-Patient Reported Outcome (WOMAN-PRO) research project focused on complications, symptoms and associated distress of women with surgically treated vulvar neoplasia. The main results of the research project are summarised, showing complications identified by clinicians, experiences reported by patients, the newly developed WOMAN-PRO instrument and symptom occurrence of each of 31 symptoms and the degree to which symptoms distressed women during the first seven days after discharge following surgical treatment for their vulvar neoplasia. Furthermore, based on the major findings of the project, suggestions for further research and clinical practice and conclusions are presented. We conclude that including patient self-report as a major element in follow-up care has the potential to enhance the quality of supportive care.

show abstract

Section: Future Research Implications/perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Women with Vulvar Neoplasia – Current Situation and Future Directions

Senn¹,

Eicher²,

Mueller³

et al. 2013

European Oncology &Amp; Haematology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2002 the Medical Research Council (MRC) in the UK issued guidance on the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions 10 which was updated in 2008 to include non-experimental methods. 18 A key message of the guidance, which is increasingly acknowledged by the international research community, [19][20][21] is that developing, piloting, evaluating, reporting and implementing a complex intervention is a lengthy process. Each stage of the process is important and placing too strong an emphasis on a phase III trial, to the neglect of earlier development and piloting work, may result in weaker interventions that are more difficult to evaluate and less likely to be implemented.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualitative research in evidence-based medicine: Improving decision-making and participation in randomized controlled trials of cancer treatments

Audrey

2011

Palliat Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Intervention development is guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for complex intervention development (Campbell et al, 2007) to ensure the development of a welldesigned, feasible, effective intervention (Senn et al, 2011). The MRC emphasize the importance of including multiple perspectives in intervention development (Campbell et al, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of an Educational Intervention Focused on Sexuality for Women with Gynecological Cancer

Cleary

McCarthy

Hegarty

2012

Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to report on the development of an educational intervention that focuses on providing women with gynecological cancer information on sexuality. Intervention development was guided by the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention development. A phased approach was taken to the design and evaluation of this complex intervention which included (1) an in-depth literature review, (2) selection of a theoretical framework, (3) a qualitative study, (4) development of intervention content and process, and (5) pilot testing of the intervention. The educational intervention consists of an information booklet combined with a verbal education session. Content of the intervention is guided by a conceptual framework of sexuality, whereas the intervention process is guided by andragogical principles and the PLISSIT model. Content validity was established by patient and expert review.

show abstract

How cancer research could benefit from the Complex Intervention Framework: students' experiences of the European Academy of Nursing Science summer school

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Women with Vulvar Neoplasia – Current Situation and Future Directions

Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Women with Vulvar Neoplasia – Current Situation and Future Directions

Qualitative research in evidence-based medicine: Improving decision-making and participation in randomized controlled trials of cancer treatments

Development of an Educational Intervention Focused on Sexuality for Women with Gynecological Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About