2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2020.203414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can we measure sliding wear in an efficient way?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wear scar surface morphologies of the as-received and machined samples are demonstrated in figure 10 and it is found that the as-received sample depicts the stack of wear debris along with larger grooves (figure 10(a)), due to the existence of tensile residual stress over the surface. Further with increase in table feed causes a surface becomes harder up to 25 mm min −1 which offer the machined surface become superior against material deterioration and it confirmed in figure 10(c), due to the presence of minimal wear debris [24]. Further increase in table feed up to 45 mm min −1 , leads to arise the wear rate slightly, due to the presence of moderate strain toughening effect and disorder.…”
Section: Effect Of Machining Conditions On the Wear Ratementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wear scar surface morphologies of the as-received and machined samples are demonstrated in figure 10 and it is found that the as-received sample depicts the stack of wear debris along with larger grooves (figure 10(a)), due to the existence of tensile residual stress over the surface. Further with increase in table feed causes a surface becomes harder up to 25 mm min −1 which offer the machined surface become superior against material deterioration and it confirmed in figure 10(c), due to the presence of minimal wear debris [24]. Further increase in table feed up to 45 mm min −1 , leads to arise the wear rate slightly, due to the presence of moderate strain toughening effect and disorder.…”
Section: Effect Of Machining Conditions On the Wear Ratementioning
confidence: 66%
“…The as-received sample exhibits a coefficient of friction and wear rate of 0.82 and 22.5±0.04×10 −5 mm 3 Nm −1 and the subsequent machining process under BEH condition has discovered the minimal coefficient of friction and wear rate of 0.48 and 4.55±0.03×10 −5 mm 3 /Nm. This decrement in wear rate over the machined surface leads to increase its wear resistance, through the decrement in surface deterioration [24]. The worned surfaces under different machining conditions are discussed in the followings.…”
Section: Effect Of Machining Conditions On the Wear Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower ball wear diameter and disc wear volume indicate the better anti-wear properties, and vice versa. [51] To value the possibility of the bio-oil as the commercial lubricant base oil, polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG 200) was tested as the control sample. PEG has been successfully used in various applications, such as lubricants and cosmetics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each profile, two reference planes are set, and an area of interest is selected and measured, as shown in Figure 7b. The reason for selecting 2D over 3D volumetric wear measurements is based on a recent report [27] showing that both approaches provide a similar ranking, but 2D measurements have a lower spread of measurement values. Based on this confocal analysis, a relative ranking of candidate coatings and the hard Cr reference in terms of maximum and mean wear depth can be achieved (Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%