How Can We Deter Cyber Terrorism?

Hua, Jian; Bapna, Sanjay

doi:10.1080/19393555.2011.647250

Cited by 22 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Terlebih, kebanyakan teroris di dunia siber, masih sama dengan pola tradisional yang mereka gunakan sebelumnya, menjadikan masyarakat sipil sebagai target. Hanya saja korban mereka bukanlah menjadi target, tetapi korban tersebut memiliki pengaruh kepada target yang sesungguhnya untuk menyebarkan ketakutan dan intimidasi (Hua & Bapna, 2012). Sehingga, perspektif terkait teror siber yang mengancam infrastruktur krusial terkait teknologi komunikasi secara ekstrim menjadi sedikit meluas.…”

Section: B Teror Siberunclassified

“…Dari banyak literatur, teror siber dilakukan dengan motivasi yang meliputi: agenda politik dan/atau ideologi (Cavelty, 2007;Holt, 2012;Hua & Bapna, 2012;Luiijf, 2012Luiijf, , 2014Pollitt, 1998;Veerasamy, 2020;Warren, 2007;Weimann, 2005); dan menyebar ketakutan juga mengintimidasi target (Beggs, 2007;Gross, Canetti, & Vashdi, 2016;Hua & Bapna, 2012;Kaplan & Weimann, 2011). Demikian juga diiyakan oleh Cavelty (2007) dengan menekankan dampak psikologis yang terjadi dari teror siber.…”

Section: B Teror Siberunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Menciptakan Ruang Siber yang Kondusif bagi Pegiat Anti-Korupsi

Wijayanto

Sardini

Elsitra

2021

Integritas: J. Antikorupsi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aims to reflect cyber-terror cases in the anti-corruption movement by Indonesian scholars in protest against the revision of the KPK Law in September 2019 and formulates the alternative solutions for anti-corruption activists’ cyber safety in the digital era. Based on focus group discussion with anti-corruption scholar activists and digital ethnography, this research found that, in general, anti-corruption activist prone to cyber-terror, and it weakened their movement. For strengthening the anti-corruption movement in the digital era, this research formulated three alternative solutions, which are: 1) strengthening consolidation of civil society organizations; 2) supporting the formulation of comprehensive cyber regulations; and 3) implementing campus mitigation. Those solutions could be the foundation for fulfilling and guaranteeing anti-corruption activists’ digital rights, especially for the freedom of expression and right to be protected in cyber-space, which is crucial for digital democracy in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: B Teror Siberunclassified

Menciptakan Ruang Siber yang Kondusif bagi Pegiat Anti-Korupsi

Wijayanto

Sardini

Elsitra

2021

Integritas: J. Antikorupsi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Deterrence has been studied extensively by sociologists and criminologists (Loughran, Paternoster, Piquero, & Pogarsky, 2011;Summers, Lyytinen, Lingham, & Pierce, 2013). Application of deterrence to cybersecurity has focused on more technical aspects (Hua & Bapna, 2012;Wible, 2003) and comparative analysis of common attributes with other types of crimes, such as trespassing (Sharma, 2007).…”

Section: Deterrence In Cybersecuritymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Criminals engage in illegal activities when their expected payoff is greater than the expected risk and cost involved (Pearson & Weiner, 1985;Straub & Welke, 1998). Although much of the discussion of deterrence theory in criminology focuses on how punishment level influences deterrence (Hua & Bapna, 2012), one might expect that deterrence is also affected by the likelihood of interdiction. Well-known biases in perceptions of chance and uncertainty suggest that cyber-attackers' risk assessment might be subject to distortions.…”

Section: Deterrence In Cybersecuritymentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavioral Determinants of Target Shifting and Deterrence in an Analog Cyber‐Attack Game

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines how exploiting biases in probability judgment can enhance deterrence using a fixed allocation of defensive resources. We investigate attacker anchoring heuristics for conjunctive events with missing information to distort attacker estimates of success for targets with equal defensive resources. We designed and conducted a behavioral experiment functioning as an analog cyber attack with multiple targets requiring three stages of attack to successfully acquire a target. Each stage is associated with a probability of successfully attacking a layer of defense, reflecting the allocation of resources for each layer. There are four types of targets that have nearly equal likelihood of being successfully attacked, including one type with equally distributed success probabilities over every layer and three types with success probabilities that are concentrated to be lowest in the first, second, or third layer. Players are incentivized by a payoff system that offers a reward for successfully attacked targets and a penalty for failed attacks. We collected data from a total of 1,600 separate target selections from 80 players and discovered that the target type with the lowest probability of success on the first layer was least preferred among attackers, providing the greatest deterrent. Targets with equally distributed success probabilities across layers were the next least preferred among attackers, indicating greater deterrence for uniform‐layered defenses compared to defenses that are concentrated at the inner (second or third) levels. This finding is consistent with both attacker anchoring and ambiguity biases and an interpretation of failed attacks as near misses.

show abstract

“…Some authors (DREMLYUGA, KOROBEYEV, FEDOROV, 2017) argue the need for a broader approach to cyber terrorism, in which the general concept of "cyber terrorism" should cover, on the one hand, directly cyberattacks (terrorist cyberattacks), and, on the other hand, all other actions performed through the information and communication environment to support terrorism. Comparative analysis of scientific views on the understanding of cyberterrorism proposed by foreign researchers (DENNING, n.d., 2007;HUA & BAPNA, 2012;BOSCH, 2004; SHARP PARKER, 2010) ; SHINDER, 2020; CLOUGH, 2015; KRASAVIN, n.d.), allows us to see the general and special constitutive aspects of the phenomenon in question. Some scientists (DINSTEIN,2015;LILIENTHAL, 2015;BROWNLIE, 1963) conclude that in the modern conditions of the scientific and technological progress development, certain negative manifestations of international relations committed in the information environment can be considered as illegal acts (from the standpoint of international criminal law).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Doctrinal comprehension of cyber terrorism in the context of intensive development of information and communication technologies in the modern world

Lobach¹,

Mamychev²,

Miroshnichenko³

et al. 2021

Laplage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper examines the doctrinal aspects of understanding cyber terrorism as an atypical manifestation (form) of traditional terrorism updated in light of the intensive development and widespread dissemination of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the modern world. The conclusion is substantiated that cyber terrorism is a conceptually relevant concept, which is perceived either as a method of committing a terrorist act (reduced understanding), or as any crimes of a terrorist nature that are committed using information and communication technologies (broad understanding). Analysis and generalization of scientific positions allowed us to define this phenomenon of social reality as the illegal use of information and communication technologies in relation to computer information, computer systems and networks in critical segments of the state and in the private sector, which pose a risk of death, causing significant property damage or the onset of other socially dangerous consequences, with the aim of whipping up fear and tension, as well as influencing the authorities for political or other motives characteristic of the ideology of terrorism.

show abstract

How Can We Deter Cyber Terrorism?

Cited by 22 publications

References 34 publications

Menciptakan Ruang Siber yang Kondusif bagi Pegiat Anti-Korupsi

Menciptakan Ruang Siber yang Kondusif bagi Pegiat Anti-Korupsi

Behavioral Determinants of Target Shifting and Deterrence in an Analog Cyber‐Attack Game

Doctrinal comprehension of cyber terrorism in the context of intensive development of information and communication technologies in the modern world

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About