2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can organisations measure their level of circularity? A review of available tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The explicit integration of circular business model inquiries was predicated on Lacy et al's 4 foundational circular business models, serving as the basis for specialised models. This was crucial due to the need for comprehensive R-imperatives and strategies in the evaluated valuation models, including the foundational ones 41 As the involvement of all stakeholders is a central success factor for the implementation of the CE, a wide range of stakeholders were considered during the development process of the assessment tool.…”
Section: Conceptual and Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The explicit integration of circular business model inquiries was predicated on Lacy et al's 4 foundational circular business models, serving as the basis for specialised models. This was crucial due to the need for comprehensive R-imperatives and strategies in the evaluated valuation models, including the foundational ones 41 As the involvement of all stakeholders is a central success factor for the implementation of the CE, a wide range of stakeholders were considered during the development process of the assessment tool.…”
Section: Conceptual and Strategic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the evaluation model from Sacco et al [2021]. stands out for its extensive representation of Eurostat Circular Economy Indicators 41,57 . Conversely, the MATChE tool 25,41 evaluates organisational strategies, allowing it to align well with the Eurostat and R-strategy indicators presented by Franco et al 37 .…”
Section: Standardisation and Comparabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the weight and indicators given to each of the pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental and social) differs greatly from one SR to another, with the social dimension being the least developed, as concluded by Alejandrino et al (2022Alejandrino et al ( , 2021 or Calzolari et al (2022). This fact was also noted in tools capable of measuring, monitoring and communicating the level of circularity of organisations (Valls-Val et al, 2022), where social performance was considered only in 60 % of the tools and with <20 % of the questions/indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%