How can carbon labels and climate-friendly default options on restaurant menus contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions associated with dining?

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to understand how restaurants can contribute to climate change mitigation via menu design. We investigated two types of interventions: changing the configuration of menu entries with variable side dishes so that the most climate-friendly option is set as the default and indicating the greenhouse gas emission of each dish via carbon labels. In an online simulation experiment, 265 participants were shown the menus of nine different restaurants and had to choose exactly one dish per menu. In six menus, the main dishes were presented with different default options: the side dish was associated either with the highest or with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions. The other three menus consisted of unitary dishes for which the default rules did not apply. All menus were presented either with or without carbon labels for each dish option. The results indicated that more climate-friendly dish choices resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions were made with the low-emission than the high-emission default condition, and when carbon labels were present rather than absent. The effects of both interventions interacted, which indicates that the interventions partly overlap with regard to cognitive predecessors of choice behavior, such as attentional focus and social norms. The results suggest that the design of restaurant menus has a considerable effect on the carbon footprint of dining.

Marketing plant‐based versus animal‐sourced foods in online grocery stores: A comparative content analysis of sustainability and other product claims in the United States

“…or "less methane")-a potential opportunity to differentiate products in the market, especially as emissions claims roll out on menus around the world (Betz et al, 2022;Kruse et al, 2021). When these elements were found, they were typically within the body of long "flavor-text" (e.g.…”

Dietary Behavior as a Target of Environmental Policy: Which Policy Instruments Are Adequate to Incentivize Plant-Based Diets?

“…If designed to be simple and clear, information on GHG emissions or certain other environmental issues had an impact on choices in experimental studies and reduced the consumption of environmentally harmful products [68,69]. A similar effect was shown on menus [70]. However, the indication of GHG emissions has a greater effect on consumers who are already environmentally conscious and who already consume comparatively little meat [71].…”

Impact of a default nudge intervention on plant-based milk consumption in a UK university café

“…However, research in this area is still developing (Reisch & Sunstein, 2021), and the effectiveness of nudges seems to vary between nudge types and context. For example, research examining plant-based diets has suggested that carbon labels do not work effectively in real-world settings (Kaljonen et al, 2020), even though they do in online experiments (Betz et al, 2022), and that the impact of positive food descriptions are mixed, with Saulais et al (2019) finding that 'dish of the day' descriptions increased plant-based food consumption among European consumers while Zhou et al (2019) did not. Furthermore, some nudges can have unintended adverse effects by reducing or reversing the desired behaviour (Mertens et al, 2022), known as 'boomerang effects' (Osman et al, 2020).…”