2017
DOI: 10.17016/ifdp.2017.1189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Biased Are U.S. Government Forecasts of the Federal Debt?

Abstract: Government debt and forecasts thereof attracted considerable attention during the recent financial crisis. The current paper analyzes potential biases in different U.S. government agencies' one-year-ahead forecasts of U.S. gross federal debt over 1984-2012. Standard tests typically fail to detect biases in these forecasts. However, impulse indicator saturation (IIS) detects economically large and highly significant time-varying biases, particularly at turning points in the business cycle. These biases do not a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hendry et al [3] derive the null distribution of IIS for independent, identically distributed (IID) data, and [4] generalize that analysis to dynamic regression models (possibly with unit roots). Hendry and Santos [5] propose an IIS-based test of super exogeneity, building on [6]; and [7][8][9][10][11][12] provide empirical applications of IIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hendry et al [3] derive the null distribution of IIS for independent, identically distributed (IID) data, and [4] generalize that analysis to dynamic regression models (possibly with unit roots). Hendry and Santos [5] propose an IIS-based test of super exogeneity, building on [6]; and [7][8][9][10][11][12] provide empirical applications of IIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What will the benchmark model be? Giacomini and Rossi (, and also Giacomini, ) suggest time‐varying relative performance of forecast models, whereas Ericsson () suggests different ways of evaluating time‐varying forecast bias.…”
Section: Out‐of‐sample Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the forecast bias may vary over time (αt), Ericsson () proposes testing time dependence of the forecast bias by regressing the forecast error term on impulse indicator dummies, that is, a 1‐0 dummy for each out‐of‐sample observation as we will next explain. That is, St+h|tFt()h=α+εt=i=1TciIit+εt,where the impulse indicator dummy Iit is unit for t = i and zero otherwise.…”
Section: Evaluating Futures Prices Forecast Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation