2017
DOI: 10.1080/13636820.2017.1326162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How are links between a National Qualifications Framework, job roles and pay mediated by industrial relations institutions in manufacturing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study intends to develop a theoretical proposition of workplace learning (WPL). The proposition is built based on collecting data on WPL practices in the work environment (Garnett, 2016a) linked to the recognition of the National Qualifications Framework (Allais, 2017a;Baker, 2017;Bohlinger, 2012;Muravyeva, 2019;Schröder, 2019), career advancement and employee income (Oliver, 2017), and employee competitiveness (Adam, 2017;Permenaker 21, 2014;Permendikbud 73, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study intends to develop a theoretical proposition of workplace learning (WPL). The proposition is built based on collecting data on WPL practices in the work environment (Garnett, 2016a) linked to the recognition of the National Qualifications Framework (Allais, 2017a;Baker, 2017;Bohlinger, 2012;Muravyeva, 2019;Schröder, 2019), career advancement and employee income (Oliver, 2017), and employee competitiveness (Adam, 2017;Permenaker 21, 2014;Permendikbud 73, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many countries are either introducing NQFs or preparing to introduce them, some research has shown that there is limited evidence of successful implementations (Raffe, 2013;Oliver & Walpole, 2017). Young (2008) found that there were three main NQF implementation problems: political, administrative, and educational; other problems related to NQF objectives have also been highlighted (Allais, 2010;Raffe, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%