2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hotspot residues and resistance mutations in the nirmatrelvir-binding site of SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Design, identification, and correlation with globally circulating viral genomes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another recent publication used combination of in silico mutational scanning combined with in-vitro testing to identify mutants N142L, E166M, Q189E, Q189I, and Q192T where nirmatrelvir showed reduced potency ( 26 ). Similar residues were also identified by in-silico molecular dynamics and high-throughput protein design approaches ( 27 , 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Another recent publication used combination of in silico mutational scanning combined with in-vitro testing to identify mutants N142L, E166M, Q189E, Q189I, and Q192T where nirmatrelvir showed reduced potency ( 26 ). Similar residues were also identified by in-silico molecular dynamics and high-throughput protein design approaches ( 27 , 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, a recent computational high-throughput protein design study identified F140I and G143D as potential mutations conferring resistance to nirmatrelvir. 66…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear, nevertheless, that we have only studied a limited number of the mutational pathways that SARS-CoV-2 took to evade nirmatrelvir. Furthermore, many of the mutations revealed by our study are without a straightforward structural explanation at this time, and indeed, while other in vitro or in silico studies have identified residues such as E166 to be of importance, they have missed these other residues that are distant from the substrate binding site [39][40][41] . It should also be mentioned that our studies were conducted with the ancestral WA1 strain, and the currently circulating Omicron variants, all of which except for BA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%