2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05514-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple pathways for SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir

Abstract: This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
265
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
31
265
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite extensive resistance profiling attempts 10,40,51 , no viral escape from molnupiravir has yet been reported, whereas pe-existing paxlovid resistance mutations have been detected in some circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains that are considered able to spread 42,52 . However, whole genome sequencing of virus population isolated from paxlovid-experienced ferrets provided no evidence that replication rebound and transmission both from and to paxlovid-treated animals in our study were supported by emerging resistance to nirmatrelvir 41-43 . Alternatively, poor control of upper respiratory infection and failure to prevent transmission could be due to lower nirmatrelvir exposure in upper respiratory tissues than lung or changing upper respiratory exposure profiles after repeat dosing.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite extensive resistance profiling attempts 10,40,51 , no viral escape from molnupiravir has yet been reported, whereas pe-existing paxlovid resistance mutations have been detected in some circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains that are considered able to spread 42,52 . However, whole genome sequencing of virus population isolated from paxlovid-experienced ferrets provided no evidence that replication rebound and transmission both from and to paxlovid-treated animals in our study were supported by emerging resistance to nirmatrelvir 41-43 . Alternatively, poor control of upper respiratory infection and failure to prevent transmission could be due to lower nirmatrelvir exposure in upper respiratory tissues than lung or changing upper respiratory exposure profiles after repeat dosing.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Whole genome sequencing of virus populations in nasal lavage and turbinate samples taken from these animals revealed that most had acquired an N501T or Y453F substitution in the Spike protein that are characteristic for SARS-CoV-2 adaptation to replication in mustelids 23 (extended data Fig. 3), but no signature resistance mutation to nirmatrelvir in nsp5 [41][42][43] emerged as allele dominant (uploaded as NCBI BioProject PRJNA894555). At study end, infectious titers and viral RNA copies in nasal turbinate tissues were statistically significantly reduced in paxlovid-treated animals compared to the vehicle group (Fig.…”
Section: Paxlovid Treatment Of Sars-cov-2 Infection In Ferretsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these results support the selection of these mutants in serial passage, there appears to be some discrepancy in the magnitude of resistance between changes in in vitro Ki compared to changes in antiviral EC 50 . This is observed for other M pro variants such as S144A, which is selected in serial passage and has been determined by Pfizer as causing a 90-fold increase in niramtrelvir K i while antiviral studies show a more modest 2-fold increase in antiviral EC 50 ( 30 ). The smaller changes in antiviral EC 50 may result from the fact that M pro has a wide range of affinities ( K d measurements ranging from 28 µM to 2.7 mM) for its different polyprotein cleavage sites ( 33 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As antiviral drug resistance is inevitable, it is vital to predict M pro drug-resistant mutants before they become dominant in the clinic. It is gratifying that our genome sequence mining approach identified similar drug-resistant mutants (E166A, E166 V, S144A) in the serial viral passage experiments . The clinical relevance of the high profile mutations identified from our genome mining approach needs to be further characterized using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 viruses in cell culture and animal models.…”
Section: Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 97%