1996
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(96)00060-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot processing of meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardness of patties prepared from post-rigor muscle was higher than those prepared from pre-rigor muscle and there was no significant difference between the addition of soybean sauce and sodium chloride (p>0.05). Pisula and Tyburcy (1996) reported that there were no differences in the binding properties of restructured beef products prepared from hot-boning or cold-boning meat. Similarly, in this study, there were no significant differences of springiness, cohesiveness, and chewiness by the rigor state (p>0.05).…”
Section: Tba Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The hardness of patties prepared from post-rigor muscle was higher than those prepared from pre-rigor muscle and there was no significant difference between the addition of soybean sauce and sodium chloride (p>0.05). Pisula and Tyburcy (1996) reported that there were no differences in the binding properties of restructured beef products prepared from hot-boning or cold-boning meat. Similarly, in this study, there were no significant differences of springiness, cohesiveness, and chewiness by the rigor state (p>0.05).…”
Section: Tba Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benefits can be summarized as follows: 1) The economical advantages include a reduction in the need for refrigerator facilities and/or frugality of labor and transport costs (Pisula and Tyburcy, 1996), and 2) pre-rigor muscle have a higher level of salt-soluble proteins, emulsifying capacity (Jones et al, 1986), and water holding capacity (Bernthal et al, 1989;Plimpton et al, 1991) due to the higher pH value and ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate) concentration, all of which are beneficial processing properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the pre-rigor muscle had a superior WHC due to the high pH value and ATP concentration (Pisula and Tyburcy, 1996). In addition, the salted pre-rigor muscle had a higher WHC than unsalted pre-rigor muscle (Bernthal et al, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Utilization of pre-rigor muscles, which are treated by hot-boned processing or accelerated processing, has many advantages, including a reduction in cooler space, decrease of energy cost and an increase in final yield as well as the improvement of meat functionalities (Hamm, 1981;Pisula and Tyburcy, 1996). Bernthal et al (1989) reported that pre-rigor meat containing salt has better physicochemical properties than post-rigor meat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%