2007
DOI: 10.1080/01973530701503150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostility-Related Prejudice Against Turks in Adolescents: Masked Affective Priming Allows for a Differentiation of Automatic Prejudice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
50
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research reveals that this dimension could also have important judgmental and behavioral consequences. For instance, Wentura and colleagues have demonstrated that behavioral approach or avoidance is far more marked for traits having implications for the person who is interacting with the trait holder and that reactions to other-relevant stimuli are better predictors of prejudice and discrimination toward specific outgroups (e.g., Turks for German participants; Degner & Wentura, 2011;Degner, Wentura, Gniewosz, & Noack, 2007). These findings thus indicate that possessor-versus other-relevance of trait words is a dimension of great interest in order to further understand people's reactions to emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Possessor-versus Other-relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research reveals that this dimension could also have important judgmental and behavioral consequences. For instance, Wentura and colleagues have demonstrated that behavioral approach or avoidance is far more marked for traits having implications for the person who is interacting with the trait holder and that reactions to other-relevant stimuli are better predictors of prejudice and discrimination toward specific outgroups (e.g., Turks for German participants; Degner & Wentura, 2011;Degner, Wentura, Gniewosz, & Noack, 2007). These findings thus indicate that possessor-versus other-relevance of trait words is a dimension of great interest in order to further understand people's reactions to emotional stimuli.…”
Section: Possessor-versus Other-relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, inter-individual differences in the ability to suppress irrelevant Furthermore, it is of considerable interest to explore what procedural features facilitate or hamper strategic manipulation of affective priming effects. The most straightforward way of preventing participants from intentional faking is to avoid them having any faking intentions, either by using a clever cover story that draws attention away of the true purpose of the study (e.g., Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995) or by preventing conscious processing of the prime stimulus (e.g., by masking it; see Draine & Greenwald, 1998;Degner, Wentura, Gniewosz, & Noack, 2007). Another possibility could be the inclusion of a secondary task as mentioned above.…”
Section: Degnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, other-relevant trait adjectives (such as ruthless, malignant, and aggressive) were found to be more attention grabbing than self-relevant trait adjectives (such as miserable, desperate, and helpless) in a working-memory paradigm (Buchner, Rothermund, Wentura, & Mehl, 2004). The influence of other-versus-self relevance on cognitive-emotional processing has also been demonstrated in other paradigms (Degner & Wentura, 2011;Degner, Wentura, Gniewosz, & Noack, 2007;Wentura & Degner, 2010;Wentura, Kulfanek, & Greve, 2005;Wentura et al, 2000). The influence of other-versus-self relevance on memory is less well documented (see Li, Li, & Guo, 2009, for an exception), but pronounced effects are to be expected based on a functional perspective.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 61%