2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-007-9175-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostility, Interpersonal Competence, and Daily Dependent Stress: A Daily Model of Stress Generation

Abstract: We used a daily diary design to evaluate a daily model of stress generation that included both daily sadness and hostility as precipitants, and interpersonal competence as a moderator variable. Our results indicated that daily stress generation was precipitated by daily hostile, but not sad, mood. Participants' skill at initiating interactions influenced daily stress generation in an unexpected direction. Specifically, the positive daily relationship between hostility and dependent stress was stronger for thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(71 reference statements)
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Caldwell et al (2004) reported a relation between negative relational self-schemata, characterized as a composite of social self-worth and self-competence, and prospective peer-related stressors. These results, however, also differed from findings from another study that found high self-perceived interpersonal competence to interact with trait hostility to predict greater daily dependent stress (Sahl, Cohen, & Dasch, 2009). Given this wide range of results, more research is required before firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the potential role of self-perceived social competence in stress generation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Caldwell et al (2004) reported a relation between negative relational self-schemata, characterized as a composite of social self-worth and self-competence, and prospective peer-related stressors. These results, however, also differed from findings from another study that found high self-perceived interpersonal competence to interact with trait hostility to predict greater daily dependent stress (Sahl, Cohen, & Dasch, 2009). Given this wide range of results, more research is required before firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the potential role of self-perceived social competence in stress generation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed an average of 11.63 diaries on time (i.e., before 3AM the day after they were mailed). This response rate of 83.1 % is similar to that of prior studies in similar samples (e.g., Sahl et al 2009). Compliance rates were unrelated to DAS score, BDNF genotype, or YASR scores ( p s > .10).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…had occurred that day. This checklist was based on measures previously used in daily stress studies with college students (Sahl et al, 2009) and was previously published in Cummings et al (2010). Each event was rated for dependence by three doctoral students in clinical psychology, using a method developed by Hammen (personal communication, August 12, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, social skills deficits in depressed individuals are associated with poor recovery and depression chronicity (for a review see Joiner, 2000;Lara & Klein, 1999). As previously mentioned, interpersonal competence has also been shown to be particularly important in the daily stress generation process, as there is some evidence that it moderates the relationship between daily negative mood and daily stressful events (Sahl et al, 2009) and mediates the relationship between current depressive symptoms and daily stressful events (Cummings et al, 2010). Expected correlates of interpersonal competence, such as reassurance seeking (Shih & Auerbach, 2010) and anxious attachment (Eberhart & Hammen, 2009), have also been shown to relate to daily stress generation.…”
Section: Personality Disorders and Stress Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation