2004
DOI: 10.5674/jjppp1983.22.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hostility and Cardiovascular Reactivity in Provoked Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the decrease was significantly smaller among the psychiatric groups compared to control participants. There are other reports of the effects of laboratory stress on baroreceptor sensitivity (Izawa, Nagano, Yoda, Kodama, & Nomura, 2004;Nagano, 2002Peckerman et al, 2003), but to our knowledge this is the first report that has employed a sample of patients with PTSD during a laboratory stressor. The smaller-magnitude decreases in baroreceptor sensitivity during the task among the combined psychiatric group may be attributable to their lower resting values (i.e., law of initial values), which appears likely given the similar effect sizes for the drop in baroreceptor sensitivity that the four diagnostic groups exhibited once initial levels were considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The magnitude of the decrease was significantly smaller among the psychiatric groups compared to control participants. There are other reports of the effects of laboratory stress on baroreceptor sensitivity (Izawa, Nagano, Yoda, Kodama, & Nomura, 2004;Nagano, 2002Peckerman et al, 2003), but to our knowledge this is the first report that has employed a sample of patients with PTSD during a laboratory stressor. The smaller-magnitude decreases in baroreceptor sensitivity during the task among the combined psychiatric group may be attributable to their lower resting values (i.e., law of initial values), which appears likely given the similar effect sizes for the drop in baroreceptor sensitivity that the four diagnostic groups exhibited once initial levels were considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%