2016
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n2n23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host status of progenies of yellow passion fruit to Meloidogyne incognita race 2

Abstract: Abstract:The host status of eighteen progenies and two cultivars (FB 200 Yellow Master and FB 300 Araguari)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread incidence of these pathogens suggests that multi-resistant genotypes would likely perform better in fields. To the best our knowledge, no passion fruit breeding program has attempted this, and genotype screenings continue to be conducted for single pathogens only (e.g., Preisigke et al ., 2015 ; Nascimento et al ., 2016 ; Zucareli et al ., 2020 ; Carvalho et al ., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread incidence of these pathogens suggests that multi-resistant genotypes would likely perform better in fields. To the best our knowledge, no passion fruit breeding program has attempted this, and genotype screenings continue to be conducted for single pathogens only (e.g., Preisigke et al ., 2015 ; Nascimento et al ., 2016 ; Zucareli et al ., 2020 ; Carvalho et al ., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, Nascimento et al (2016) reported that 19 out the 20 yellow passion fruit genotypes were susceptible to M. incognita, with R value ranging from 1.1 to 6.3; however, root galling was not observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%