2010 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cluster.2010.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Side Dynamic Reconfiguration with InfiniBand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why minhop will not deadlock on a ring constructed out of four nodes is the fact that its implementation in OpenSM assigns symmetric paths for source-destination and destination-source pairs, thus, it breaks the credit loop necessary for a deadlock to occur. However, it is a well known fact that minhop deadlocks on at least a 5-node ring [Guay et al 2010], and any 3-stage fat-tree that has more than one root contains such a ring. Therefore, almost any 3-stage or larger fat-tree routed with minhop will potentially deadlock, thus, it makes our experiment valid and practical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason why minhop will not deadlock on a ring constructed out of four nodes is the fact that its implementation in OpenSM assigns symmetric paths for source-destination and destination-source pairs, thus, it breaks the credit loop necessary for a deadlock to occur. However, it is a well known fact that minhop deadlocks on at least a 5-node ring [Guay et al 2010], and any 3-stage fat-tree that has more than one root contains such a ring. Therefore, almost any 3-stage or larger fat-tree routed with minhop will potentially deadlock, thus, it makes our experiment valid and practical.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example also shows that any 3-stage fat-tree can deadlock with node-to-node and switch-toswitch traffic present, if minhop is run on it. This is because minhop is unable to route a ring of 5 nodes or bigger in a deadlock-free manner [Guay et al 2010], and almost any (apart from a single-root tree) 3-stage fat-tree will contain a 6-node ring. By having shown this deadlock example, we have demonstrated the need for an algorithm that will provide deadlock-free routing in fat-tree topologies when switch-to-switch communication between all switches is present.…”
Section: Switch-to-switch Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 summarises the optimisation feedback cycle that consists of the SM, the PM and our modified host stack with the host side dynamic reconfiguration capability [12,11]. In a subnet, the SM periodically sweeps the subnet to discover changes and maintain a fully connected subnet.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduce a performance manager [14] that monitors the network using hardware port counters to detect congestion and optimises the current VL allocation by classifying flows as either slow lane (contributors to congestion) or fast lane (victims of congestion). Then the optimisation is applied using the host side dynamic reconfigration method we proposed in [12]. The effect being that all flows contributing to congestion are migrated to a separate VL (slow lane) in order to avoid the negative impact of head-of-line blocking on the flows not contributing to congestion (victim flows).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation