2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08410-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host Plants of World Agrilus (Coleoptera, Buprestidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In North America, at least 42 Agrilus species are related to oaks (Coleman and Seybold, 2016, citing others), and according to Jendek and Poláková (2014), the genus Quercus is host for 90 Agrilus species worldwide. In North America, at least 42 Agrilus species are related to oaks (Coleman and Seybold, 2016, citing others), and according to Jendek and Poláková (2014), the genus Quercus is host for 90 Agrilus species worldwide.…”
Section: Risk Of Misidentificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In North America, at least 42 Agrilus species are related to oaks (Coleman and Seybold, 2016, citing others), and according to Jendek and Poláková (2014), the genus Quercus is host for 90 Agrilus species worldwide. In North America, at least 42 Agrilus species are related to oaks (Coleman and Seybold, 2016, citing others), and according to Jendek and Poláková (2014), the genus Quercus is host for 90 Agrilus species worldwide.…”
Section: Risk Of Misidentificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mexico and not present in Europe (Jendek and Poláková, 2014). Further work would be needed to fully establish the molecular sequencing of A. anxius, though it can already be used.…”
Section: Laboratory Testing and Pest Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…la sfera di valutazione della validità di un sottogenere è spesso aleatoria e soggetta a opinioni talora discutibili, ma in questo caso, pur non volendo entrare nel merito della fauna Est paleartica, ritengo che i sottogeneri proposti per la fauna occidentale non siano accettabili: le differenze morfologiche invocate non sono sufficienti, in quanto la fauna italiana, per quanto riguarda il genere Agrilus, è molto omogenea. Questa mia opinione è confortata anche da quella di altri autori che nei loro contributi hanno ignorato tali sottogeneri sia per la fauna paleartica occidentale (Forel & leplat 2000;Brechtel & Kostenbader 2002;Petitprêtre & Marengo 2011), sia per quella E paleartica (per esempio Jendek 2003aJendek , 2003bJendek , 2003c.…”
Section: Materiali E Metodiunclassified