2018
DOI: 10.1111/rego.12228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horses for courses: China's accommodative approach to food standard‐setting in response to the internationalization of regulation

Abstract: This paper examines the evolution of China's food standard‐setting procedures from both domestic and international perspectives, particularly in the context of the internationalization of regulation. After the reform and opening‐up in 1978, state actors and leading enterprises monopolized the process of national food standard setting. With further participation in the global economy in the 21st century, China has become familiar with the international standard‐setting procedures and has modeled its domestic po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standards can also function as strategic tools (de Vries, 2006;Delimatsis, 2015b;Larouche and van Overwalle, 2015;Chu, 2020) and competitive devices (Heires, 2008) for industrial promotion (Victor, 2000) with which actors can exploit the presence of asymmetric information and organizational differences (Delimatsis, 2015c;Mavroidis and Wolfe, 2017). Indeed, technological innovation usually precedes standardization and different previously existing standards compete for becoming the international standard to which harmonization will take place.…”
Section: Multilateral Trade Agreements and International Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standards can also function as strategic tools (de Vries, 2006;Delimatsis, 2015b;Larouche and van Overwalle, 2015;Chu, 2020) and competitive devices (Heires, 2008) for industrial promotion (Victor, 2000) with which actors can exploit the presence of asymmetric information and organizational differences (Delimatsis, 2015c;Mavroidis and Wolfe, 2017). Indeed, technological innovation usually precedes standardization and different previously existing standards compete for becoming the international standard to which harmonization will take place.…”
Section: Multilateral Trade Agreements and International Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%