1983
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(83)90013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

36
418
6
54

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 757 publications
(523 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
36
418
6
54
Order By: Relevance
“…Several follow-up studies tackle the same issue. Schumann (1993) conducts an event study analysis of 37 acquisitions that were challenged by the FTC over the period [1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987] and comes up with the same pattern of abnormal returns as in Eckbo (1983) and Eckbo and Wier (1985). He reports positive abnormal returns to rivals around the antitrust complaint, which are positive and larger for smaller rivals.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several follow-up studies tackle the same issue. Schumann (1993) conducts an event study analysis of 37 acquisitions that were challenged by the FTC over the period [1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987] and comes up with the same pattern of abnormal returns as in Eckbo (1983) and Eckbo and Wier (1985). He reports positive abnormal returns to rivals around the antitrust complaint, which are positive and larger for smaller rivals.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as far as the acquirer's returns are concerned, the preliminary results of literature reviews are ambiguous. Where Dodd (1980), Chang (1998) and Mitchell and Stafford (2000) confirmed that the acquirer's shareholders suffer losses, on the other hand, Asquith (1983) and Eckbo (1983) found positive abnormal returns for the acquirer firms' shareholders.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…12;2013 In cases of legally challenged mergers, the hypothesis is that it could provide negative abnormal return for the rival firms, when the merger is challenged, because it would mean reducing the possibility of the realization of what presumably comes due to the generation of a greater market power. Eckbo (1983), however, finds positive but statistically insignificant results.…”
Section: Anticompetitive Effects and Pursuit Of Monopoly Powermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on studies that analyzed the performance of stock prices of companies that underwent mergers, Stillman (1983) and Eckbo (1983) reject the hypothesis of market power. Researches show that rival firms do not benefit from higher prices and have no abnormal gains.…”
Section: Anticompetitive Effects and Pursuit Of Monopoly Powermentioning
confidence: 99%