2000
DOI: 10.21314/jcf.1999.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopscotch methods for two-state financial models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…American and path-dependent options require numerical solutions of the pricing PDE. Examples include Forsyth et al (1999), who present a finite element approach to the pricing of lookback options with SV; Kurpiel and Roncalli (2000), who develop hopscotch methods for SV and other two-state models; and Apel et al (2002), who develop a finite element method for an SV model.…”
Section: Jump Processes and Sv Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American and path-dependent options require numerical solutions of the pricing PDE. Examples include Forsyth et al (1999), who present a finite element approach to the pricing of lookback options with SV; Kurpiel and Roncalli (2000), who develop hopscotch methods for SV and other two-state models; and Apel et al (2002), who develop a finite element method for an SV model.…”
Section: Jump Processes and Sv Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare equation (14) with equation (16) suppose first that ρ = 0. In this case, the third term in equation (14) vanishes.…”
Section: Pure Delta Hedgingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, researchers have used Monte Carlo or finite difference methods to solve stochastic volatility option pricing problems. Kurpiel and Roncalli [1998] show how to apply Hopscotch methods, a class of finite difference algorithms introduced initially by Gourlay [1970], to two-state financial models. Unlike Monte Carlo, Hopscotch methods are very useful for American option pricing and easy greeks computing in a stochastic volatility framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches used to numerically solve the option pricing PDE under the Heston model include: an incomplete LU (ILU) pre-conditioned conjugate gradient method with a penalty term devised by [49] to handle the early exercise feature of American options; multigrid methods used by [8] and [30] to price American options; a hopscotch scheme applied by [19] to price American options; a finite element approach constructed by [47] to price European and barrier options; an exponential fitting in combination with splitting and Yanenko method by [36]; various ADI schemes augmented to include the cross derivative correlation term by [22] and an ADI predictor-corrector scheme by [48]. A number of schemes used to solve LCPs were also compared by [20,21] including a PSOR method, a projected multigrid method, an operator splitting method and a component wise splitting method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%