2001
DOI: 10.1002/qua.1117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hopping conductivity in nucleotide base stacks*

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The frequency-dependent complex hopping conductivities of single nucleotide base stacks and base pair stacks were calculated on the following basis:(1) The determination of the density of states of these disordered systems with the help of the matrix block negative counting method. (2) Using the inverse iteration technique, the Anderson localization of the one-electron functions belonging to the physically interesting levels were computed. (3) With the help of the latter quantities the hopping frequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical efforts towards this goal explore different overlapping approaches. Ladik and coworkers calculated the conduction gap by performing ab initio band structure calculations at the HF and MP2 levels on homonucleoside polymers 13,14 and aperiodic nucleotide base stacks. 15,16 HF calculations within a 6-31g* basis set were performed by Jortner and colleagues, [17][18][19][20][21] essentially in order to evaluate the donor-acceptor coupling term of the Marcus theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical efforts towards this goal explore different overlapping approaches. Ladik and coworkers calculated the conduction gap by performing ab initio band structure calculations at the HF and MP2 levels on homonucleoside polymers 13,14 and aperiodic nucleotide base stacks. 15,16 HF calculations within a 6-31g* basis set were performed by Jortner and colleagues, [17][18][19][20][21] essentially in order to evaluate the donor-acceptor coupling term of the Marcus theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%