Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing Based (H2-DAB) Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

Ayaz, Muhammad; Abdullah, Azween

doi:10.1109/icimt.2009.70

Cited by 168 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These heterogeneous sensor nodes are deployed according to LSN thin model [6] but they are placed at specific location according to deployment algorithm. These nodes are deployed in horizontal direction along with pipeline length, they can't move freely with the water currents but the courier nodes have vertical movement with a special hardware [28]. By following these patterns, all nodes are deployed in one line starting from the one corner of pipeline and ending at another.…”

Section: Network Architecture and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scalable Nodes Deployment Algorithm for the Monitoring of Underwater Pipeline

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater Wireless Linear Sensor Networks (UW-LSNs Keywords: scalability, heterogeneity, nodes deployment algorithm, underwater pipeline monitoringCopyright © 2016 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. All rights reserved. IntroductionUnderwater environments do not remain feasible for human operators due to the harsh underwater activities, high water pressure, hazardous underwater creatures, vast areas for exploration and lack of high frequency signals propagation [1]. Due to the underwater acoustic communication, the signal propagation speed is decreased to the speed of sound. Although in underwater, sound waves travel longer and faster than the air but still they are five times slower than the electromagnetic waves [2]. Most of deployment algorithms and routing protocols do not remain suitable for such environments as they necessitate random nodes deployment, joint topology, 2D area, higher data rate, and outcomes in large end-to-end delays [3]. Although significant areas of improvement are highly required to be there in UW-LSN monitoring techniques like scalable nodes deployment, distribution of large network, minimization of the delay in communication and efficient data deliveries to the sink; but the available data rates for the long range underwater applications is very low and not feasible for the real time communication. In short, it seems to be hard to increase the data rate for the long range underwater communication where scalable and efficient nodes deployments in distributed topology are highly supportive in this regard.In fact, UW-LSNs and terrestrial sensor networks have many common properties including deployment of large number of nodes and energy constraints; but UW-LSN stays unique in many aspects from the terrestrial sensor networks [4]. Firstly, most of the times homogenous types of sensor nodes are deployed randomly that are not scalable for extension of underwater pipelines monitoring coverage. Secondly, UW-LSN requires special deployment algorithms that assign proper nodes positions in 3D dynamic underwater environment. Thirdly, sensors are linearly deployed to maintain the linear topology and distributed topology network [5] that divides the pipeline length into sub-zones and ranges of heterogeneous sensors.

show abstract

Section: Network Architecture and Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scalable Nodes Deployment Algorithm for the Monitoring of Underwater Pipeline

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Packets arriving at any of the sinks will be considered as conveyed effectively. H2H-DAB has numerous favorable circumstances [12]: it doesn't oblige any particular equipment, no dimensional locational data obliged and node developments can be taken care of effectively without keeping up mind complex routing tables. The impediment of this convention is: while picking a forwarder node, the source does not get a reaction from its neighbors particularly in sparse systems.…”

Section: Hop-by-hop Dynamic Address Based Routing Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors in [19] have proposed a dynamic addressing based routing protocol named H2H-DAB and it does not take into consideration as the greater part of the protocols. Sensor nodes utilize the dynamic address to get new delivers as indicated by their new positions at distinctive depth levels.…”

Section: Hop-by-hop Dynamic Address Based Routing Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parametric Comparative Analysis of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Routing Protocols

Garg¹,

Waraich²

2015

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The underwater wireless sensor networks have found many applications in today's world as they are used in medical applications, sea exploration, military applications and many more. With the advancement in the underwater wireless sensor networks technology, new research challenges are found that are to be resolved like how efficient routing can be done without sacrificing energy consumption of the sensor nodes, how the deployment of the sensor nodes should be done and so on. Due to the movement of sensor nodes with the water currents, the deployment and routing becomes a difficult task. In this paper, various routing protocols like Information Carrying routing protocol, Depth Based routing protocol, Constraint Based Depth based routing protocol, Directional flooding routing protocol are discussed and a comparative analysis of these routing protocols on the basis of various parameters like localization information, network topology, and use of control packets, network architecture used is presented.

show abstract

“…UWSNs have a unique problem for providing an efficient communication [16]. "Ayaz M, Abdullah A" proposed distributed protocol for UWSN, in view of neighborhood data.…”

Section: International Journal Of Computer Applications (0975 -8887) mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Routing Protocols for the Underwater Wireless Sensor Network

Bhardwaj¹,

Kaur²,

Kumar³

2017

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) obtained the information from the underwater sensors nodes. In which there are lots of issues and difficulties in underwater like size, limited battery power, deployment and limited bandwidth capacity. In underwater, it is difficult to recharge or substitute the battery of the sensors nodes. In such circumstances the concentrate on reducing the battery utilization of the sensors nodes. There are various techniques are used to reduce the battery utilization. The design of routing protocols for underwater sensor networks creates numerous challenges due to essential properties of the underwater environment. Many routing protocols have been proposed in order to provide an efficient, reliable and route discovery between the sources and the sink. It also has more through-put as compared to the existing technique. In this paper, display a survey and comparison of various groups according to their taxonomy with their ability is discussed in detailed.

show abstract

Hop-by-Hop Dynamic Addressing Based (H2-DAB) Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

Cited by 168 publications

References 5 publications

Scalable Nodes Deployment Algorithm for the Monitoring of Underwater Pipeline

Scalable Nodes Deployment Algorithm for the Monitoring of Underwater Pipeline

Parametric Comparative Analysis of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Routing Protocols

A Survey on Routing Protocols for the Underwater Wireless Sensor Network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About