2013
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n3p77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homonymy, Polysemy and Zero Derivation in the English-Macedonian Context

Abstract: Since the notions of homonymy, polysemy and zero derivation share some characteristics that make them similar, while they are independent language phenomena that linguistically distinguish from one another; this

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an integral feature of natural languages, their constituent. Words of any language form a universal base for developing polysemy, with almost any language unit having sufficient potential to develop new meanings as demonstrated by research results (Tuggy, 1993;Golubcova, 2002;Gyori, 2002;Kubrjakova, 2003;Vaneva, 2003;Vassiljev, 2009;Popova, 2011;Glebkin, 2014;Olchovskaja, 2015). Traditionally, polysemy is referred to as presence of several meanings, lexico-semantic variants in one word (Novikov, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an integral feature of natural languages, their constituent. Words of any language form a universal base for developing polysemy, with almost any language unit having sufficient potential to develop new meanings as demonstrated by research results (Tuggy, 1993;Golubcova, 2002;Gyori, 2002;Kubrjakova, 2003;Vaneva, 2003;Vassiljev, 2009;Popova, 2011;Glebkin, 2014;Olchovskaja, 2015). Traditionally, polysemy is referred to as presence of several meanings, lexico-semantic variants in one word (Novikov, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Paslavska, outlining the general features of affixal negation in Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages, notes that the prefix de-is negative in these languages [2]. According to Marjana Vaneva, «negative prefixes show privative meaning when by adding the negative element to the base we deprive the base of the thing expressed with the basic element» [3]. Bruno Cartoni, Marie-Aude Lefer note, that «de-attaches to verbs and nouns to form reversal and removal verbs, which are frequently nominalised or adjectivalised» in different languages [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various meanings concerning homonymy are not correlated with each other or derived from those others, so they are regarded as different lexical units and the identical form is deemed inadvertent, which means there is lack of morphological connection (Matthews, 2014). That is to say, homonymy pertains to existence of more than one morphological specification sharing the same phonological and graphic form (Carstairs-McCarthy, 2010: 210-213;Vaneva, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%