2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homology modeling and structural analysis of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary structure of the m11βHSD2 model exhibited a central 6-stranded all-parallel β-sheet sandwich-like structure, flanked on both sides by 3-helices (Fig. 1A and B), which are in agreement with the h11βHSD1 and 2 models 18,33. For the construction of the m11βHSD2 model, 10 independent models of the target proteins were built using a Boltzmann-weighted randomized modeling procedure in the MOE that is adapted from reports by Levitt21 and Fechteler et al22 The intermediate models were evaluated by a residue packing quality function, which is sensitive to the degrees to which non-polar side-chain groups are buried and hydrogen bonding opportunities are satisfied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The secondary structure of the m11βHSD2 model exhibited a central 6-stranded all-parallel β-sheet sandwich-like structure, flanked on both sides by 3-helices (Fig. 1A and B), which are in agreement with the h11βHSD1 and 2 models 18,33. For the construction of the m11βHSD2 model, 10 independent models of the target proteins were built using a Boltzmann-weighted randomized modeling procedure in the MOE that is adapted from reports by Levitt21 and Fechteler et al22 The intermediate models were evaluated by a residue packing quality function, which is sensitive to the degrees to which non-polar side-chain groups are buried and hydrogen bonding opportunities are satisfied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The contact energy profiles of the homology-modeled m11βHSD2 (Fig. 3A) was compared with that of the X-ray structure of h11βHSD1 and the homology-modeled h11βHSD2,18 and the trends of the variation in the contact energy in most parts of the m11βHSD2 model were in good agreement with those of the h11βHSD1 and 2 structures. The binding site volume of the m11βHSD2 model was also calculated with the MOE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations