2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-011-1140-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular docking and structural analysis of cofactor-protein interaction between NAD+ and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2

Abstract: Molecular docking and structural analysis of the cofactor-protein interaction between NAD(+) and human (h) or mouse (m) 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11βHSD2) were performed with the molecular operating environment (MOE). 11βHSD1 (PDB code: 3HFG) was selected as a template for the 3D structure modeling of 11βHSD2. The MOE docking (MOE-dock) and the alpha sphere and excluded volume-based ligand-protein docking (ASE-dock) showed that both NAD(+)-h11βHSD2 and NAD(+)-m11βHSD2 models have a similar bindi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural superimposition of S. aureus IDH with both human IDH isoforms (PDB ID: 1T09, 1TOL) showed considerable variations in both domain and non domain regions and these differences were also observed in the sequence and active site structures (Figure 4) [12, 13]. The docking of isocitrate to both human and S. aureus IDH structures revealed higher affinity for human IDH compared to S. aureus [7, 8] correlating with enzyme kinetics [21, 23] Table 2 (Figure 5). This pathogen colonizes mostly in the nasopharyngeal tract as biofilms by adjusting its metabolic flux [1, 3, 22] and regulates TCA cycle to produce virulence factors thus spreads its infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural superimposition of S. aureus IDH with both human IDH isoforms (PDB ID: 1T09, 1TOL) showed considerable variations in both domain and non domain regions and these differences were also observed in the sequence and active site structures (Figure 4) [12, 13]. The docking of isocitrate to both human and S. aureus IDH structures revealed higher affinity for human IDH compared to S. aureus [7, 8] correlating with enzyme kinetics [21, 23] Table 2 (Figure 5). This pathogen colonizes mostly in the nasopharyngeal tract as biofilms by adjusting its metabolic flux [1, 3, 22] and regulates TCA cycle to produce virulence factors thus spreads its infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing Molecules Suitable for a JAMDA Docking Study. Depending on the focus of the study, molecular docking is applied for different ligand types, including cofactors, 139 peptides, 140 nucleic acids, 141 and oligosaccharides. 142 However, molecular docking is most frequently used to screen small molecule libraries to find novel leads or to predict the binding mode of experimental screening hits for SAR analyses and hit advancement.…”
Section: Comparison Of Jamda To Other Docking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare the ligand, ChemBioDraw Ultra was used to draw, write, and save the dimensional structure of rhein as a PDB format [ 271 ]. Docking experiments were carried out using the docking algorithms employed in MOE [ 272 ]. Site Finder module of MOE was used to dig for the active site within the macromolecule.…”
Section: Docking Experiments Investigating Plausible Natural Effector...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site Finder module of MOE was used to dig for the active site within the macromolecule. Hydrophobic pockets were considered as the active sites [ 272 ]. The Triangle Matcher method was used to evaluate the docking of ligand molecules within the active sites the receptors [ 273 ].…”
Section: Docking Experiments Investigating Plausible Natural Effector...mentioning
confidence: 99%