1975
DOI: 10.1021/jm00237a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homologous N-alkylnorketobemidones. Correlation of receptor binding with analgesic potency

Abstract: For a homologous series of N-alkylnorketobemidones a statistically significant correlation was found between the relative abilities to bind mouse brain homogenate in vitro and their in vivo mouse hot-plate analgesic potencies. The correlation between in vitro binding in the presence of 100 mM sodium and analgesic potency was not as good AS THAT as that found in the absence of sodium. A statistically significant correlatin was found between thir analgesic potencies and their abilities to antogonize electrically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For ketobemidones (Fig. 1), and to a lesser extent meperidine, increasing the length of the N-substituent from methyl to ethyl and propyl markedly reduces affinity for the opiate receptor and analgesic potency, while pentyl, hexyl, and heptyl substituents provide potent opiate agonists, but the octyl, nonyl, and decyl substituents result in a marked loss of activity (24). Ethyl and propyl substituents may interfere with the approach of the amine nitrogen to the anionic site of the receptor, accounting for reduced potency.…”
Section: Conformational Features Of Certain Potent Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ketobemidones (Fig. 1), and to a lesser extent meperidine, increasing the length of the N-substituent from methyl to ethyl and propyl markedly reduces affinity for the opiate receptor and analgesic potency, while pentyl, hexyl, and heptyl substituents provide potent opiate agonists, but the octyl, nonyl, and decyl substituents result in a marked loss of activity (24). Ethyl and propyl substituents may interfere with the approach of the amine nitrogen to the anionic site of the receptor, accounting for reduced potency.…”
Section: Conformational Features Of Certain Potent Agonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Kosterlitz documented a dramatic difference between the ",u receptors" of the guinea pig ileum (where morphine is pharmacologically more potent than opiate peptides) and the "8 receptors" of the vas deferens (where the opposite rank order ofpotency is apparent) (3). The ,u-receptor-like rank order of potency of opiates in displacing[3H]naloxone binding from brain membranes correlates quite precisely with their ability to elicit "analgesia" in rodents (4,5) as well as to suppress guinea pig ileal contractions (6), while the 8-receptor-like rank order ofdisplacement of3H-labeled opiate peptide binding correlates with the suppression of mouse vas deferens contractions (3, 7).It has been previously reported that GTP inhibits "type 1" opiate binding, which has a ,-receptor-like ligand selectivity pattern (8, 9) and a highly discrete localization in brain when visualized autoradiographically (10). By contrast, "type 2" binding is more sensitive to displacement by peptides than by alkaloids (8, 9), has a much more diffuse brain distribution (11), and is more resistant to GTP inhibition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[3H]naloxone binding from brain membranes correlates quite precisely with their ability to elicit "analgesia" in rodents (4,5) as well as to suppress guinea pig ileal contractions (6), while the 8-receptor-like rank order ofdisplacement of3H-labeled opiate peptide binding correlates with the suppression of mouse vas deferens contractions (3,7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Compton et al (1993) demonstrated significant correlations between the cannabinoid CB 1 -receptor binding affinities and cannabinoid-like “tetrad” effects for 29 compounds. Similar studies have validated the clinical analgesic relevance of ÎŒ-opioid receptor binding assays (Wilson et al, 1975; Pert and Snyder, 1973). Presently, it was reasoned that if the [ 3 H]cimetidine-binding site represents the improgan antinociceptive receptor, then the [ 3 H]cimetidine-binding affinities for improgan-like congeners should correlate with their antinociceptive potencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%