2015 3rd International Conference on Control, Engineering &Amp; Information Technology (CEIT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ceit.2015.7233116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenous and secure weighted clustering algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of implementing a clustering protocol include reduced energy consumption, communication overhead during data transmission, increased connectivity, and decreased delay [22]. Dynamic clustering [23], weighted clustering [24] and hierarchical clustering [25] are some of the clustering protocols that have been successfully implemented. There are many approaches for nominating a CH in clustering based on several parameters, such as the remaining energy of the SN, SN location, or SNs density.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of implementing a clustering protocol include reduced energy consumption, communication overhead during data transmission, increased connectivity, and decreased delay [22]. Dynamic clustering [23], weighted clustering [24] and hierarchical clustering [25] are some of the clustering protocols that have been successfully implemented. There are many approaches for nominating a CH in clustering based on several parameters, such as the remaining energy of the SN, SN location, or SNs density.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The node process analysis with sensor activity observation is provided to control the energy dissipation. A. Dahane, N. E. Berrached and A. Loukil [13] has used the concept of weighted dynamic clustering environment with security integration. The analysis of this mobile sensor network is done with specification of five metrics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Σε κάθε πείραµα µεταβάλλεται µία από τις ακόλουθες παραµέτρους του δικτύου : α) το πλήθος των κόµβων, ϐ) το µέγεθος του ϐήµατος και της ταχύτητας για τα µοντέλα RW και RWP αντίστοιχα, γ) το µέγεθος του δικτύου και δ) η διάρκεια της περιόδου κινητικότητας. Οι τρεις πρώτες παράµετροι επιλέγονται ϐάσει της σχετικής ϐιβλιογραφίας[AQLKA15],[Den11],[LGF08],[DBL15]. Αρχικά, οι κόµϐοι κατανέµονται οµοιόµορφα σε µία τετραγωνική περιοχή µεγέθους x × x και το εύροςΣχήµα 3.4: Μετρικές επίδοσης ως προς το µέγεθος του δικτύου (x), n = 200, Mtime = 300, step/v = 0.1:(α΄) Μέση διάρκεια σύνδεσης για το σενάριο non-overlap (ϐ΄) Ποσοστό αποσυνδεδεµένων κόµβων για το σενάριο non-overlap και (γ΄) Ποσοστό αποσυνδεδεµένων κόµβων για το σενάριο overlap το RWP παρουσιάζει τη χειρότερη επίδοση στο εύρος n ∈ [50, 700].…”
unclassified