1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.1994.tb01267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogenization of milk emulsions:use of microfluidizer

Abstract: The operating efficiency of a laboratory scale microfluidizer had been compared to that of a high pressure valve homogenizer using either pasteurized whole milk or recombined milk. Microfluidization was found to be a very effective method for reducing fat globule size and was only slightly affected by changes in operating pressure. The back pressure module on the microfluidizer had a marginal effect on particle size increase. As a result, the homogenization effect was always greater than that of conventional h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a); the first peak was at 458 nm, while the second peak had a relatively large diameter (3672 nm), representing fat globules that were not disrupted by CH, or that had probably coalesced. These results corroborate the findings of previous studies done on milk and other dairy-based emulsions; many authors have reported that microfluidization produced smaller fat globules with narrower size distribution than valve homogenization (Cobos et al, 1995b;Hardham et al, 2000;McCrae, 1994;Pouliot et al, 1990;Whiteley & Muir, 1996). Furthermore, Dalgleish et al (1996) and Tosh and Dalgleish (1998) showed that microfluidization of milk not only disrupted fat globules but also disintegrated casein micelles, resulting in smaller particle size.…”
Section: Particle Size In Milksupporting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1a); the first peak was at 458 nm, while the second peak had a relatively large diameter (3672 nm), representing fat globules that were not disrupted by CH, or that had probably coalesced. These results corroborate the findings of previous studies done on milk and other dairy-based emulsions; many authors have reported that microfluidization produced smaller fat globules with narrower size distribution than valve homogenization (Cobos et al, 1995b;Hardham et al, 2000;McCrae, 1994;Pouliot et al, 1990;Whiteley & Muir, 1996). Furthermore, Dalgleish et al (1996) and Tosh and Dalgleish (1998) showed that microfluidization of milk not only disrupted fat globules but also disintegrated casein micelles, resulting in smaller particle size.…”
Section: Particle Size In Milksupporting
confidence: 95%
“…In the last two decades, microfluidization, an HPH technique that can create fine emulsions, has been developed (Cook & Lagace, 1987). Microfluidization generates high velocity microstreams as a fluid accelerates into an interaction chamber, generating high shear and impact forces that cause the formation of fine emulsions (McCrae, 1994). The technology has been utilized as an alternative method for homogenizing milk (Cobos, Horne, & Muir, 1995b;Dalgleish, Tosh, & West, 1996;Hardham, Imison, & French, 2000;McCrae, 1994;Strawbridge, Ray, Hallett, Tosh, & Dalgleish, 1995;Whiteley & Muir, 1996) and for processing a range of dairy products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing homogenisation pressure, with little further decrease in droplet size, results in unnecessary energy consumption. McCrae (1994) reported that the optimal operating pressure of a Microfluidizer® for homogenisation of milk was 50 MPa, corresponding to our results for cream liqueur. However, defining the optimal pressure would require further trials in a narrower range around 50 MPa.…”
Section: Influence Of Homogenisation Pressure and Number Of Stages Onsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This high energy homogenization apparatus incorporates a high pressure intensifier pump which delivers product to an interaction chamber at speeds of up to 400 m s À1 , generating pressures in the range 20e275 MPa. In the interaction chamber, the product is subjected to turbulence, cavitation and shear, which elicit structural changes, such as reducing particle size in emulsions (McCrae, 1994;Pouliot, Paquin, Robin, & Giasson, 1991;Strawbridge, Ray, Hallett, Tosh, & Dalgleish, 1995), or reductions in molecular weight of polysaccharides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%