2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-70772014000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Homogeneidade Versus heterogeneidade da estrutura de dívida: um estudo com dados em painel

Abstract: This article argues that new contributions to the study of capital structure can be obtained from the study of corporate debt structure. More specifically, it addresses the issue of homogeneity and heterogeneity in debt structure, including its relevance and determinants, and incorporates a theoretical discussion. Because of the novelty of this topic in Brazil, a study was conducted that analyzed the debt structure of 113 companies over a period of 5 years. The results show that homogeneous and heterogeneous d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DS is positively related to the lower leverage ratios (Tengulov 2015). In contrast, Povoa and Nakamura (2014) state that leverage ratio cannot explain variation in the debt structure. Companies with more leverage prefer public debts on bank loans (Denis and Mihov 2003).…”
Section: Predictors Of Debt Specialization 221 Organizational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, DS is positively related to the lower leverage ratios (Tengulov 2015). In contrast, Povoa and Nakamura (2014) state that leverage ratio cannot explain variation in the debt structure. Companies with more leverage prefer public debts on bank loans (Denis and Mihov 2003).…”
Section: Predictors Of Debt Specialization 221 Organizational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Colla et al (2013) are among the first to recognize cash flow volatility, growth opportunities, cash holdings, research and development expenses, advertising expenses, strong board, unique product, size, maturity, credit rating, profitability, tangibility, and leverage are the main antecedents of DS. Size and age are considered essential factors in determining the debt composition (Povoa and Nakamura 2014). Larger and mature companies generally employed diversified types of loans, whereas small and new firms rely on few debt choices (Khan et al 2017b).…”
Section: Predictors Of Debt Specialization 221 Organizational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pontos críticos ainda podem ser observados na construção da principal variável dependente nos modelos de regressão utilizados: o endividamento. Os trabalhos pesquisados, em sua grande maioria, utilizam tal variável, de maneira agregada ignorando a diversidade de sua composição (maturidade, origem, acessibilidade, prioridade de recebimento, dentre outros) bem como seus reflexos sobre o fluxo de caixa e demais contas patrimoniais NAKAMURA, 2014NAKAMURA, , 2015.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…Um dos questionamentos clássicos sobre estrutura de capital é o nível ideal na relação entre capital pró-prio e capital de terceiros que maximiza o valor da empresa. Este, dentre outros questionamentos, é marcado por diversas respostas divergentes, de modo que não há como responder a essa pergunta de forma única e objetiva no ambiente de capitais brasileiro Correa, Basso & Nakamura, 2013;Póvoa & Nakamura, 2014).…”
Section: Em Consideração a Trade Off Theoryunclassified