Homework for New Changes in The Future: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This literature review focuses on the relationship between working from home (WFH) and the new future order. The method employed is a bibliometric literature review that was examined using VOSviewer software. The VOSviewer software analysis technique was used to assess papers produced via the Scopus database and utilized as a reference for researchers. The findings of 315 papers were cited from 2020 to 2022, with just 40 articles being evaluated. The researchers then clarified and visualized co-authorship, co-accurance, and citation using VOSviewer softwareThis literature review, as a whole, provides a reliable starting point for additional research on the topic at hand. Working from home refers to a variety of methods of working that are common among today's workers. Working from home is a flexible and automated work method that allows employees to work from home via telecommuting, teleworking, and remote work by leveraging modern digital technology tools as a bridge to work. All men and women between the ages of 25 and 60 can work from home. Working flexibly in the "New Normal" focuses on the new order in the possibility of working from home is more focused on using SWOT analysis, which intends to read and observe working from home in the future

How teleworking adoption is changing the labor market and workforce dynamics?

“…For example, Febriani and Churiyah utilized Scopus database to retrieve articles published between 2020 and 2022 using more comprehensive keywords: ("work from home," "telecommuting," "teleworking," and "remote work. “) ended up evaluating only 40 articles [ 24 ]. More recently, Tereza et al presented a theoretical framework for remote work adaptation at personal, organizational, and governmental levels identifying trust, communication, and leadership as the most critical concepts in remote working research.…”

Review of work from home empirical research during Covid-19

“…The empirical investigations ensure enough consistency for methodological quality to provide findings that satisfy internal validity ( Petticrew & Roberts, 2006 ; Priyashantha, De Alwis, & Welmilla, 2022a ). We discovered a review study on WFH in COVID-19 ( Febriani & Churiyah, 2022 ) 2) that suffers from flaws in the criteria above. Besides, the authors are unaware of a complete synthesis of the empirical study findings on identifying the current knowledge and gaps of WFH in COVID-19 research, notably conducted between 2020 and 2022, despite the prevalence of several review studies on WFH in COVID-19.…”