2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home range size and daytime habitat selection of leopards in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased habitat suitability for leopards has been related to proximity to water sources [98], [99], areas covered by thick bushes and forest types [1], [100], and with positive NDVI [55]. This study corroborates the importance of water availability in terms of habitat suitability for leopards, though in the Ruaha landscape the species avoided areas of increased net productivity, instead favouring habitat types with less vegetation cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Increased habitat suitability for leopards has been related to proximity to water sources [98], [99], areas covered by thick bushes and forest types [1], [100], and with positive NDVI [55]. This study corroborates the importance of water availability in terms of habitat suitability for leopards, though in the Ruaha landscape the species avoided areas of increased net productivity, instead favouring habitat types with less vegetation cover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For example, the highest known densities of both Leopard and Tiger within Thailand are in the same area (Khao Nang Rum) within Huai Kha Khaeng (Simcharoen et al . ). It is notable that this site also has high densities of both medium (Red Muntjac, Eurasian Wild Pig) and large prey (Gaur, Banteng).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each station was located within a 1.7 × 1.7‐km (2.89 km 2 ) cell, and was situated as close to the center of each cell as possible to avoid clumping of stations, while not compromising the suitability of the location. We chose the size of each cell to increase the likelihood that all individual animals were camera trapped, based on home range data from radio collaring studies conducted on leopards in Thailand (8.8–45.7 km 2 ; Rabinowitz , Grassman , Simcharoen et al ). The spacing between cameras was roughly half the diameter of the lowest estimate of a leopard's home range (8.8 km 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%